Obama & Larry Sinclair

[CGP]

Larry Sinclair's YouTube Profile
http://www.youtube.com/user/larrysinclair0926

VIDEO LINKS:

Part 1
YouTube - OBAMA'S LIMO SEX & DRUG PARTY

Part 2
YouTube - Obama's Sex & Drug Party pt 2

Part 3
YouTube - Obama's Sex & Drug Party pt 3

Part 4
YouTube - Obama's Sex & Drug Party pt 4

Part 5
YouTube - Larry Sinclair's Fighting On

More
YouTube - I Blew Obama

Radio Interview

Intro: YouTube - Larry Sinclair Interview - Drugs And Sex With Obama - Intro

Part 1: YouTube - Larry Sinclair Interview - Drugs And Sex With Obama Pt. 1

Part 2: YouTube - Larry Sinclair Interview - Drugs And Sex With Obama Pt. 2

[CGP]

I guess time will tell as to whether these allegations are true or not. But it was only a matter of time before something like this emerged. The only reason Obamamania has taken off recently is because Obama is new and fresh, the latest fad on YouTube! The public knows nothing about Obama and the media have conveniently failed to report on any of Obama's negatives - and they indeed exist, it's just that the a sexist media won't report them as they want Hillary to lose. But just you wait - the GOP will have a field day if BO is selected - and all the trash in the world come out!

[CGP]

Source: http://www.gayboy.at/news/12692

Title: "Is Obama Gay?"

Text: Article in German

Translator: Go to http://www.freetranslation.com (and use German to English feature)

Ist Barack Obama ein verkappter Schwuler? Darüber diskutieren in amerikanischen Internet-Foren derzeit die User. Wirkliche Beweise gibt es dafür nicht. Aber gerade mit der Einführung des Internets, das die schwule medienaffine Community in den USA heiß und innig liebt, werden derzeit täglich Foren geboren, die sich mit dem Thema beschäftigen.

Was ist an dem Gerücht dran? Eigentlich nicht viel. Etliche Webseiten zeigen einfach eine Abfolge von Barack-Bildern, die seine Homosexualität visuell beweisen sollen. »Einschlägige« Bilder gibt es zuhauf: Der Kandidat ist keine bullige Erscheinung wie Konkurrent Mike Hukabee und kein Hetero-Opi von John McCain. Er verhält sich zurückhaltend und sanft – Eigenschaften, die oft homosexuellen Männern zugeschrieben werden. Hinzu kommt, dass er neben der Power-Frau Hillary Clinton vielen als der weiblichere Kandidat erscheint.

Auch in seiner Politik glaubt so mancher Schwulitäten zu entdecken: Manche glauben, dass Obama sich nicht für Öffnung der Ehe einsetzt, weil er seine Homosexualität verstecken will. »Warum will Obama nicht die Homo-Ehe unterstützen, wenn er doch so gegen Diskriminierung ist«, fragt ein Kolumnist in einem schwulen Lokalmagazin. »Will er von seinem eigenen Verhalten ablenken, indem er doch etwas tougher wirkt?«. Diese Meinung wird aber von wenigen geteilt. Viel wahrscheinlicher ist, dass er eigentlich nichts gegen die Homo-Ehe hat. Aber er kann das nicht sagen, damit der einfältige Bubba-Wähler aus der Provinz keinen Herzinfarkt bekommt. So – und das sagen viele seiner schwulen Anhänger – funktioniert nun mal Politik.

Bleiben aber immer noch die wunderschönen Fotos, die ihn in Posen zeigen, wie man sie aus Schwulenbars kennt. Leider hat Obama auch keine Exklusivität darin: Derlei Seiten gibt es auch für George W. Bush. Und den wollen wir ja keinesfalls in unseren Reihen haben, nicht mal als devoten Sklaven mit Vorlieben fürs harte Spanking.

[CGP]

Larry Sinclair has filed a suit against Obama claiming that he is has been a victim of slander after he posted his video allegations on YouTube:

SMOKING GUN ARTICLE (http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0214081obama1.html) (Feb 14, 2008)

[BloodDAnna]

http://www.whitehouse.com/ apparently this site has brokered a deal with Larry Sinclair where they are paying for the polygraph and will give the guy $100,000 if he passes.

[CGP]

Wow, thanks BDA!

This cannot be good for the Obama campaign. Full text below.

Here is the direct link: HERE (http://www.whitehouse.com/NewsComments.aspx?start=&NewsID=109)

Date: 17 Feb 2008

Source: Whitehouse (http://www.whitehouse.com/NewsComments.aspx?start=&NewsID=109)

"Larry Sinclair Accepts Polygraph Challenge"

The truth will set you free they say, but the truth plus $100,000 will set you even freer. That's the conclusion our good friend Larry Sinclair has come to after considering the offer we made him yesterday: $10,000 to take a polygraph test over his Barack Obama sex and drugs claims, and $100,000 if he passes it.

After communicating via email to work out the logistics of the challenge, we were able to reach an agreement. Now, the plan is to get together with Sinclair and one of the best polygraph experts in the country, and ask him some questions – with the camera rolling, of course. As more details are made available we will post it here.

The results of the whole thing will be posted right here on Whitehouse.com. Our pockets lighter by either ten grand or ten times that amount, we'll all have a better sense of what to make of Sinclair's almost-too-unbelievable-to-be-unbelievable allegations against a Senator who is poised, perhaps, to make history.

Mr Sinclair has put up instead of shutting up so we will see which way the chips fall.

[Kammers]

BUSTED!!! OH WE'LL MAKE SURE THEY DO. THIS IS BEING POSTED EVERYWHERE, BUT PLEASE POST WHERE YOU THINK IT WILL MAKE AN IMPACT.

From: Lori
Date: 23/02/2008

Sinclair v. Obama, et al

Named as defendants: Barack Obama, David Axelrod and AKP Message and Media, and The Democratic National Committee, Howard Dean, Chairman.

This is the approximate verbiage, as I do not have the original document·

This action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1981, 18 U.S.C. 241 and the First Amendmant of the United States Constitution’s right to Freedom of Speech. Defendants have and continue to conspire against the rights of citizens in that they are actively engaged in ongoing internet intimidation, claim to be conducting illegal investigations into plaintiff’s personal life, actively involved in preventing allegations of illegal drug use and sexual activity involving Defendant Obama from becoming public knowledge.

Plaintiff states that he personally engaged in sexual activity and personally used illegal drugs in November 1999 with U.S. Senator Barack Obama on two separate occasions. Plaintiff states that he attempted to contact defendant Obama in the fall of 2007 to advise defendant Obama to make his 1999 use of illegal drugs public himself and that if he did not do so then plaintiff would have no choice but to come forward as defendants’ actions were relevant to his running for President of the United States. Defendant Obama ignored plaintiffs attempts to allow defendant Obama to reveal this information on his own.

It sounds to me as though Sinclair is tired of being hung up on when he has attempted calling Axelrod, and has been ignored by the media that he’s spoken to since last fall.

Thus far, Larry Sinclair has spoken with The New York Post, Fox News, MSNBC, and numerous others, yet for some odd reason, nothing has come of this.

Developing…

Update 2/13:
http://caosblog.com/7245

From: VOTE SMART! VOTE HILLARY!
Date: Feb 23, 2008 1:47 PM

Guess the gop ,cnn/ msnbc and media dont want this out!!
before the primaries are over..
RE: Larry Sinclair ALEGATIONS TOWARDS OBAMA


I just want it to be clear that the Sinclair tape is not in any way an attack on
our gay friends. We love and need you. The key use of the Sinclair video is to
show that Obama has not been truthful about his "experimental years" as a part of his youth. There's plenty of info out there that this is a story that has been out for a number of years and not just recently fabricated.
No one has been offended so far by this video but I want to make sure that
our gay friends know that this is no way an attack on the gay community. Sinclair himself is gay and wants people to know the truth about Obama's drug use.


RE: HERES SOME MORE ON LARRY SINCLAIR /OBAMA
Larry Sinclair Takes Polygraph Test Early; Results Soon
Friday February 22nd, 2008 9:52 PM by BHDC Staff
Filed under: Sex, Scandals, Barack Obama, Drugs, Larry Sinclair, WhiteHouse.com
“Due to security concerns, we had to move the Larry Sinclair polygraph up a few days,” reports WhiteHouse.com. “We conducted it in secret today and the picture to the left is from from one of the two arduous polygraphs Sinclair underwent today.”

According to the Web site, “the process took four grueling hours, testing Sinclair’s claims of sex and drug use separately and also including a drug screening to ensure that Sinclair didn’t enlist any chemical assistance.”

Sinclair was paid $10,000 for his participation and has pledged to donate most of the funds to charity.

The site reports that the “results are being confirmed by a second expert” and that there will be “conclusive word” of the results on Monday or Tuesday. Video of the process will be hosted on the site.
LINK BELOW!!

http://bigheaddc.com/category/barack-obama/

COURT DOCUMENTS FILED BY LARRY SINCLAIR,
LINK BELOW!

http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-mndce/case_no-0:2008cv00360/case_id-96322/

[CGP]

Fox News Video Clip - who is Bill O'Reilly talking about in this clip?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjPuVJwWg-Q

[BloodDAnna]

He's supposed to take the polygraph tomorrow so I guess we shall see

[CGP]

He's supposed to take the polygraph tomorrow so I guess we shall see

Actually, the tests have already been done and Sinclair "failed" them. There have been subsequent allegations, however, that the polygraph tester was not properly qualified and that the results were fudged. Also, polygraph testing is not accepted in court as it has no scientic credibility! So, it's a pretty useless way to guage whether someone is telling the truth about something.

Here is the latest i/view with Larry Sinclair:

http://bigheaddc.com/2008/02/25/exclusive-interview-with-obamas-accuser/

[BloodDAnna]

I was under the impression that it was to be filmed and shown online, guess they did'nt do that. I think the guy believes what he is saying, at least he got some money out of it.

[Valencia]

What do you guys think about all this? Is LS telling the Thruth?

[CGP]

What do you guys think about all this? Is LS telling the Thruth?

Who knows...It's just one man's word against another's...

There are 2 options:

1. it's true
2. it's false

I wonder if we will ever find out the answer?

[BooskerD]

I'm really torn. Sinclair allegedly failed the polygraph test given by whitehouse.com. Whitehouse.com has released very little about the test and shows only two typed questions that Sinclair supposedly showed deception on. Sinclair accuses whitehouse.com of changing payment plans and accepting payment from Axelrod to "throw" the test, while whitehouse.com alleges that Sinclair hasn't put them in contact with the limo driver as promised. Bottom line, nobody is going to touch this. For one thing, dems pretty much maintain that one's "personal" life, no matter how sleazy, should not have any bearing on their performance as a political figure. Second, while it certainly seems possible that Obama could have been involved in such a scandal, Sinclair doesn't seem very credible. Nobody will touch this.

[CGP]

I agree. I don't see this going anywhere in the mainstream media anytime soon as it's basically one man's allegations with no supporting evidence. If it is true, however, I don't think Larry Sinclair is going to stop anytime soon. He seems intent on pursuing this matter.

[BooskerD]

I agree. I don't see this going anywhere in the mainstream media anytime soon as it's basically one man's allegations with no supporting evidence. If it is true, however, I don't think Larry Sinclair is going to stop anytime soon. He seems intent on pursuing this matter.

You're not kidding...check this out! http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com/

Looks like whitehouse.com is stopping payment on a check because Larry is violating their agreement that he not take another polygraph elsewhere. This is starting to look very suspicious...

[CGP]

LS is a very fiesty character it seems and refuses to be intimidated. He isn't stopping with this at all...

[SwiftFox]

If Obama is gay or bisexual, that's fine with me. I have gay friends. If he had a sexual encounter with Sinclair, that bothers me from a moral standpoint, because I don't like infidelity. However, I also think something like that should mainly be dealt with between Obama and his wife. On the other hand, considering he's always claiming moral authority on all sorts of things, I think the public would have a right to question his morals/ethics, if indeed he was unfaithful to his wife.

As for Sinclair's allegations of cocaine use by Obama, I consider these to be very troubling, if true.

And if Sinclair's allegations are true that he has been harassed by Obama's campaign, those are also deeply troubling.

I think eventually, the media is going to have to pay attention to the allegations since Sinclair has filed a lawsuit. I'd like to know if there's any substance to any of them.

[BooskerD]

I'm gay myself and I find the whole gay "sex scandal" part to be irrelevant, although amusing in light of his attitude towards gays. I am concerned about these allegations made by Sinclair against Axelrod- it's a big, serious deal for me if he's paying these people to "throw" the polygraph. It's also a big, serious deal if Sinclair is indeed receiving threats from Axelrod and others associated with Obama's campaign. Only time will tell, I guess. Sinclair doesn't seem crazy, but what the heck do I know? He could be making this whole mess up. I can't imagine why he'd make all this up, but then I can't imagine why he would ever have brought any of this up in the first place.

One thing is for certain...if Obama wins the nomination, this will come up. If Obamamaniacs think Hillary has been nasty in her attacks against Obama, they should just wait until the republicans get a hold of him.

[CGP]

One thing is for certain...if Obama wins the nomination, this will come up. If Obamamaniacs think Hillary has been nasty in her attacks against Obama, they should just wait until the republicans get a hold of him.

Precisely, they haven't seen NOTHING! And given how outraged they become now even when minor criticisms are dished out, I can only imagine how badly these obamamaniacs will behave when the GOP gets going. It won't be pretty. One way to prevent all of this? VOTE HILLARY!

[CGP]

I too am gay so obviously that aspect does not bother me in the slightest.

The issue is more one about integrity, character and honesty. If it honestly did happen, and if Larry Sinclair has been pressued to keep quiet, than I think he would have every right to draw attention to a "cover-up" in light of how "ethical" Obama presents himself to be. If it didn't happen, than it's a truly horrible way to try and smear Obama's character and LS should be stopped.

PS - I have watched Sinclair's videos and he seems mentally stable.

[Valencia]

I too am gay so obviously that aspect does not bother me in the slightest.

The issue is more one about integrity, character and honesty. If it honestly did happen, and if Larry Sinclair has been pressued to keep quiet, than I think he would have every right to draw attention to a "cover-up" in light of how "ethical" Obama presents himself to be. If it didn't happen, than it's a truly horrible way to try and smear Obama's character and LS should be stopped.

PS - I have watched Sinclair's videos and he seems mentally stable.

Sinclair's seems mentally stable to mee as well.

[BooskerD]

I too am gay so obviously that aspect does not bother me in the slightest.

The issue is more one about integrity, character and honesty. If it honestly did happen, and if Larry Sinclair has been pressued to keep quiet, than I think he would have every right to draw attention to a "cover-up" in light of how "ethical" Obama presents himself to be. If it didn't happen, than it's a truly horrible way to try and smear Obama's character and LS should be stopped.

PS - I have watched Sinclair's videos and he seems mentally stable.

Yep. I agree.

[CGP]

This radio interview was conducted Jan 23, 2008. Larry Sinclair speaks very clearly and logically.

Intro: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTz7nojEC80
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQIZS...eature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQIZSPQ2ilc&feature=related)
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz0ZF...eature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz0ZFP87tBw&feature=related)

[CGP]

Latest video from Larry Sinclair: Feb 28, 2008

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eeGqySYqNjc

[BooskerD]

He sounds absolutely sane and he's not going to let this thing die. I wish he could come up with receipts or something, or take another lie detector test with somebody reputable. If Obama wins the democratic nomination, I'm sure McCain's folks will pay for a polygraph.

Still, I wonder why he brought all of this up in the first place. Is it really bugging him so much that Obama lied about drug use? Any ideas?

[CGP]

He sounds absolutely sane and he's not going to let this thing die. I wish he could come up with receipts or something, or take another lie detector test with somebody reputable. If Obama wins the democratic nomination, I'm sure McCain's folks will pay for a polygraph.

Still, I wonder why he brought all of this up in the first place. Is it really bugging him so much that Obama lied about drug use? Any ideas?

Yes, he sounds san and he is definitely not dropping this anytime soon. He is very determined for whatever reason.

Polygraphs are notoriously unreliable and are so unreliable that courts refuse to accept the results as evidence.

I think the reason he is pursuing this is because, like many of us, he feels a duty to challenge Obama's hypocritical "ethics". That is, LS's view is that Obama is presenting himself to be person ABC when Larrry knows him to be XYZ!

But again, I have no opinion as to whether the allegations may be true or not. And I wonder if the truth will ever be publicy revealed/confirmed one way or another.

[RAFREE]

What bothers me most about this story is that if it were about one of the Clinton's and if it got as far as it did on the net the media would have a field day ruining her campaign with it!!!!

Obama gets a pass again whether it's true or not. L.S. does seem stable and it's so weird how all that info is hard to find on W.H. now...why? Why would they not just leave it as record??

[CGP]

What bothers me most about this story is that if it were about one of the Clinton's and if it got as far as it did on the net the media would have a field day ruining her campaign with it!!!!

Obama gets a pass again whether it's true or not. L.S. does seem stable and it's so weird how all that info is hard to find on W.H. now...why? Why would they not just leave it as record??

Indeed!

[BooskerD]

What bothers me most about this story is that if it were about one of the Clinton's and if it got as far as it did on the net the media would have a field day ruining her campaign with it!!!!

Obama gets a pass again whether it's true or not. L.S. does seem stable and it's so weird how all that info is hard to find on W.H. now...why? Why would they not just leave it as record??


I get the feeling that whitehouse.com is basically pro-Obama. It makes a lot of sense that they'd not publicize the truth if it will place a blotch on Obama's name.

[CGP]

I get the feeling that whitehouse.com is basically pro-Obama. It makes a lot of sense that they'd not publicize the truth if it will place a blotch on Obama's name.

I think it's more than conceivable that whitehouse.com had every intention of discrediting Sinclair, right from the outset. Their agenda was never made clear, and perhaps that's why!

[RAFREE]

I too am gay so obviously that aspect does not bother me in the slightest.

The issue is more one about integrity, character and honesty. If it honestly did happen, and if Larry Sinclair has been pressued to keep quiet, than I think he would have every right to draw attention to a "cover-up" in light of how "ethical" Obama presents himself to be. If it didn't happen, than it's a truly horrible way to try and smear Obama's character and LS should be stopped.

PS - I have watched Sinclair's videos and he seems mentally stable.

They sure shut him up didn't they?

I think he is credible...lol. I think it would be great if Obama was gay and agreed to be vp to Hillary. That way we could have woman and a gay man for president and REALLY change the world!!! She'd have to chastise him though for that SC debacle AND his stance on gay civil unions. blah.

I still cannot believe Obama has got this far! He used Oprah Winfrey and dirty tricks to do it. I'm NEVER going to forgive Dopey Opey for this. N.E.V.E.R.

[BooskerD]

I still cannot believe Obama has got this far! He used Oprah Winfrey and dirty tricks to do it. I'm NEVER going to forgive Dopey Opey for this. N.E.V.E.R.

Here's something funny...I can't stand Oprah and have long referred to her lobotomized followers as "Oprarians", as in the cult of Oprah. Reading your post just jogged my memory and I am now seeing that the two are somewhat similar. They attend the same church and they both have swarms of people who hang on their every empty word. I wonder how much money Oprah has plugged into Obama's campaign?

[BloodDAnna]

I had been an Oprah fan gosh, since back in the day when it was just her and Donahue. Not anymore. She was always a Clinton supporter and how fast did she bail? I feel the same way about my elected officials, come election time anyone who did not support Hillary is NOT getting my vote.

[CGP]

I had been an Oprah fan gosh, since back in the day when it was just her and Donahue. Not anymore. She was always a Clinton supporter and how fast did she bail? I feel the same way about my elected officials, come election time anyone who did not support Hillary is NOT getting my vote.

I hear ya! So many traitors have emerged during this election, and we should not forget how quickly they turned their backs on HRC. And for what???!!!

[RAFREE]

The biggest slap in the face to me re: Oprah is that she urged Hillary to run for president!! Then she back stabbed her for all the world to see.

I cannot forgive her for stumping around, giving over one hundred million dollars to Obama and using money she made off of female support to back the candidate most all of her viewers do not want!!

[CGP]

The biggest slap in the face to me re: Oprah is that she urged Hillary to run for president!! Then she back stabbed her for all the world to see.

I cannot forgive her for stumping around, giving over one hundred million dollars to Obama and using money she made off of female support to back the candidate most all of her viewers do not want!!

And then presenting him to the public as "The One", like he's some kind of God. I am really shocked she fell for him so easily and so hard!

[RAFREE]

And then presenting him to the public as "The One", like he's some kind of God. I am really shocked she fell for him so easily and so hard!


Sadly, I am not. I've felt for a while now that Oprah has gone off the New Age deep end. She and Stedman had huge problems, she seems sooo out of touch with everything in the "real" world anymore.

Telling her regular viewers who have children, middle incomes and sky high bills to go on a journey like "Eat, Love, Pray" endorses. Actually, I felt that was a mediocre book at best. It was an interesting concept but, literally impossible!! If I could afford to go to Italy, and India I'd certainly go. But somehow a whole year devoted to indulgence and spiritual growth does not fit in with my son who has an L.D., his needs, my bills, my workaday avalanche of time constraints.

She is a day dreamer who has the money to be that self indulgent. I didn't realize how far it had gone though. Now she wants her spiritual adviser to be president and if she can't endorse him into it then she will buy it for herself!!

[IndyRobin]

Hello,

I am a therapist and I watched these LS video's and, while I can not be 100%
certain, I can tell you this, I believe this man is telling the truth.

A liar would "fill in all the blanks" ... leave no gaps in memory because he would simply make it all up. This guy however, freely admits to not being sure about certain things, admits that half the time he was not paying attention to details, and tells a convuluted story. A liar would "keep it simple" so he could remember the details. This guy states that his "limo driver called BO"
A liar would dismiss this type of detail and just say "I met him in a bar" and would never even mention a limo because he doesn't LOOK like a man who could afford a Limo.

There were dozens of indications that a trained professional would recognize as being truthful in these videos. His lack of attention to certain key details is indictive of a person that has used drugs, not that of a liar. Were he lying he would have EXACT details that could never be verified and the narative
would leave out everyone except he and BO.

Now, given all this there are pathological personalities that would be clever enough to spin this yarn and recognize the skills necessary to make themselves sound believable. However, my clinical experience and gut level feeling tells me this guy is not one who would pocess such skills

VIDEO DESCRIPTION:

YouTube Quote: "Mr. Obama has continued to lie about his past in regards to his use and sale of drugs and his sex with a gay male in 1999"

VIDEO LINKS:

Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY

Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-rdlE7qjug

Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJvXbmnS2UM

Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3V9uscyVHYI&feature=related

Part 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eeGqySYqNjc

Larry Sinclair's YouTube Profile
http://www.youtube.com/user/larrysinclair0926

Radio Interview
Intro: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTz7nojEC80
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQIZSPQ2ilc&feature=related
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz0ZFP87tBw&feature=related

[RAFREE]

Here's something funny...I can't stand Oprah and have long referred to her lobotomized followers as "Oprarians", as in the cult of Oprah. Reading your post just jogged my memory and I am now seeing that the two are somewhat similar. They attend the same church and they both have swarms of people who hang on their every empty word. I wonder how much money Oprah has plugged into Obama's campaign?


She has given him at LEAST one hundred million dollars! She is buying us HER choice for president. I think she has really lost it doing this. The presumption that I would personally need to go on HER journey for "the ONE" is scary and ridiculous! Perhaps I'm a Hindu Oprah?? good lord!! Perhaps I believe in keeping my spiritual life separate from my political choices?? Perhaps I think if someone is a "light" rather than a hard factual experienced, and qualified person they ought to be teaching in an ashram somewhere and not running for president.

What is wrong with her? She seems to have let narcissism run rampant!

[BooskerD]

She has given him at LEAST one hundred million dollars! She is buying us HER choice for president. I think she has really lost it doing this. The presumption that I would personally need to go on HER journey for "the ONE" is scary and ridiculous! Perhaps I'm a Hindu Oprah?? good lord!! Perhaps I believe in keeping my spiritual life separate from my political choices?? Perhaps I think if someone is a "light" rather than a hard factual experienced, and qualified person they ought to be teaching in an ashram somewhere and not running for president.

What is wrong with her? She seems to have let narcissism run rampant!

She and Obama go to the same church, so I'm assuming they're somewhat acquainted that way...plus, maybe they're like two little peas in the same twisted, little pod. Money combined with an illusion of power seems to have gone to both of their heads- both are cult figures, too. I'm immune to obsessions over public figures and it freaks me out to see people swooning over Obama like this.

[CGP]

Larry has a new video in regards to his allegations against Obama:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhbZoUWBmRA

[RAFREE]

I think it would be WISE for the press to cover this right now, before Obama gets up against the republicans and Larry becomes Obama's Jennifer Flowers!!

I can't believe he thinks people have been hard on him!! The republicans have run campaigns that drummed up fake murders in the past. They do NOT care WHAT they say or do. Michelle's business dealings will come out and be fair game, Larry will be trotted out true or not he'll be brought up relentlessly, Rezco will be daily headlines.

[CGP]

The original video has now received more than 650,000 views. This is well and truly in the public domain. Larry is not stopping. He seems motivated more than ever to pursue this issue. Best that this issue be dealt with sooner rather than later!

[RAFREE]

The original video has now received more than 650,000 views. This is well and truly in the public domain. Larry is not stopping. He seems motivated more than ever to pursue this issue. Best that this issue be dealt with sooner rather than later!

;) I think Larry is going to do all he can to be sure that it does!

[SantaCruzen]

I guess the High Road is another way that Axelrod likes to spin his head trip:

Said a clearly impassioned David Alexrod last night, "If Senator Clinton wants to take the debate to various places, we'll join that debate. We'll do it on our terms and in our own way but if she wants to make issues like ethics and disclosure and law firms and real estate deals and all that stuff issues, as I've said before I don't know why they'd want to go there, but I guess that's where they'll take the race.'' That's right, because the high road never won anybody anything.
http://www.whitehouse.com/NewsComments.aspx?start=&NewsID=138#comments

That has been my point for months now: Obama takes the High Road. That is why he cannot hold a candle in the wind in a real debate that is not obscured by media glitz and glamor. The new millennium media are a bunch of actors who could not make it as real actors. I mean watch them. They really are a sore lot of attention grubbing egomaniacs. That is why BO appeals them. He has the same potential charm of as a sports caster.

[SantaCruzen]

No matter if it turned out that Sinclair's case is true or false, this is a real test of the Obama Campaign. They are ignoring him. His worshipers have given this man death threats. I mean, where is the moral proclamation to denounce the threats of his own campaign fellowship?

The Obombers get away with a lot of boasting and threatening activities. I listened to San Francisco KGO the other night. I never do but listened with a friend. Emails and letters from Obombanators were really nasty and rude if not demeaning and threatening. What kind of Fool Aid, I meant Kool Aid is he passing out at his rallies?

[SantaCruzen]

Too bad that Sinclair had to also elaborate on the sex. If it was only drugs, well maybe they would want to know more. A polygraph test is not a sure fire mechanism. Any real liar can pass one. I mean, G.W.B. can pass any polygraph on 911. It takes calmed nerves.

Albeit that the Sinclair issue may be one that is too hot to touch. He did claim that he gave records to a Chicago reporter to investigate him. That is really not my point though. According to Sinclair, he received threats from the Obama Camp. If that is true, then that is a case in and of itself.

Threats to a person for speaking freely is not illegal.

[SantaCruzen]

I think it's more than conceivable that whitehouse.com had every intention of discrediting Sinclair, right from the outset. Their agenda was never made clear, and perhaps that's why!

The easiest way to shut this guy up is to fake a test. He seems to be pretty smart though. He has filed papers from what he has shown. If that is true, then he does have a case about the Obama camp blocking his Freedom of Speech.

If Obama cannot prove that Sinclair is a liar or has no evidence, then actually Sinclair has a right to say what he thinks in private and public. Obama is a public figure. We all know that Bill Clinton and Hillary Rodham Clinton have had their own personal lives blown out in the media as well as cartoons and malicious and vicious imagery. So, why is the Obama camp immune to public opinions? He is not. It is the old "sticks and stones will break my BOnes but Words will never hurt me."

I think that what we can assume is that the LGBT community needs to ask BOnes deep questions about his views on the privacy and freedoms of citizens.

[CGP]

No matter if it turned out that Sinclair's case is true or false, this is a real test of the Obama Campaign. They are ignoring him. His worshipers have given this man death threats. I mean, where is the moral proclamation to denounce the threats of his own campaign fellowship?

The Obombers get away with a lot of boasting and threatening activities. I listened to San Francisco KGO the other night. I never do but listened with a friend. Emails and letters from Obombanators were really nasty and rude if not demeaning and threatening. What kind of Fool Aid, I meant Kool Aid is he passing out at his rallies?

This inciting of aggression, hatred and violence within some of the Obama supporters has been one of THE most disturbing aspects of the Obama campaign. If Obama was any kind of leader who would speak out against hateful behavior and set the standard for what is and isn't acceptable behavior.

[CGP]

TAccording to Sinclair, he received threats from the Obama Camp. If that is true, then that is a case in and of itself. Threats to a person for speaking freely is not illegal.

We see a recurring pattern:

- black superdelegates threatened
- tavis smiley (& family) threatened
- larry sinclair allegedly threatened
- hillary supporters bullied, abused and victimized

Is this what Obama refers to as "the change we can believe in" ????

[xfiles]

This should be sent to media outlets and some intrepid investigative reporter will get to the bottom of it. It sounds too good to be true (regarding getting rid of Obama as a candidate), but it might very well be true also. Hmmmmm....

I am going to send it where I can and everyone else should do so also!

[Lodi]

Sadly, I am not. I've felt for a while now that Oprah has gone off the New Age deep end. She and Stedman had huge problems, she seems sooo out of touch with everything in the "real" world anymore.

Telling her regular viewers who have children, middle incomes and sky high bills to go on a journey like "Eat, Love, Pray" endorses. Actually, I felt that was a mediocre book at best. It was an interesting concept but, literally impossible!! If I could afford to go to Italy, and India I'd certainly go. But somehow a whole year devoted to indulgence and spiritual growth does not fit in with my son who has an L.D., his needs, my bills, my workaday avalanche of time constraints.

She is a day dreamer who has the money to be that self indulgent. I didn't realize how far it had gone though. Now she wants her spiritual adviser to be president and if she can't endorse him into it then she will buy it for herself!!

Agree wholeheartedly wilth all that you said, and I am the sole caretaker of my adult brother, who has Down syndrome. I can think of better uses for that $100 million, relevant to your son and my bro!

I wonder if Obama will turn out to be a scandal like the one with the book A Million Little Pieces (or whatever). Her judgment does seem to be clouded all too often lately.

[freespirit]

She and Obama go to the same church, so I'm assuming they're somewhat acquainted that way...plus, maybe they're like two little peas in the same twisted, little pod. Money combined with an illusion of power seems to have gone to both of their heads- both are cult figures, too. I'm immune to obsessions over public figures and it freaks me out to see people swooning over Obama like this.

You are so right. I haven't watched Oprah in years - too busy working. But you're right that people are too easily swayed by her. She has told us what books to read, how to raise our children, which experts we should listen to for help with a wide variety of problems. Not to be disrespectful, but did she not feature the surgeon who operated on Kanye West's mom? I was told that she had him on her show where he was presented as the premier plastic surgeon in CA. We know what the outcome of the surgery was. Ms. West died. I just think she has an inflated opinion of herself and her ability to know what is best for the world. She didn't know BO as well as she thought she did, or either she is as superficial and corrupt as he is.

[freespirit]

I'm really torn. Sinclair allegedly failed the polygraph test given by whitehouse.com. Whitehouse.com has released very little about the test and shows only two typed questions that Sinclair supposedly showed deception on. Sinclair accuses whitehouse.com of changing payment plans and accepting payment from Axelrod to "throw" the test, while whitehouse.com alleges that Sinclair hasn't put them in contact with the limo driver as promised. Bottom line, nobody is going to touch this. For one thing, dems pretty much maintain that one's "personal" life, no matter how sleazy, should not have any bearing on their performance as a political figure. Second, while it certainly seems possible that Obama could have been involved in such a scandal, Sinclair doesn't seem very credible. Nobody will touch this.

I thought that although he failed the polygrapy regarding sex and drugs with BO, he did pass the polygraph that tested whether he was being truthful when he said he was not on drugs at the time he made the accusation. Maybe someone else has heard something about this.

Also, I would like to point out the obvious - out of respect to gays who are part of this forum. No one is condemning the gay community, but it is a big deal if BO is gay - just one more misrepresentation of himself. Also, he has been very unsupportive of gay community.

[toryinpa]

larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com

He states he now has an Attorney. This site is an up to date site that belongs to LS.

Pretty interesting stuff.....I wonder if there's anything to it!?

tory

[CGP]

Also, I would like to point out the obvious - out of respect to gays who are part of this forum. No one is condemning the gay community, but it is a big deal if BO is gay - just one more misrepresentation of himself. Also, he has been very unsupportive of gay community.

Yes, I am gay, and I fully support open discussion of this topic. Drawing attention to the Larry Sinclair issue is not about criticizing homosexuality, it's about critiquing Obama's authenticity/sincerity/trustworthiness. And yes, Obama's politics have not be empowering to gays/lesbians AT ALL.

Also note - polygraphs have no scientific validity. The results of polygraphs are not acceptable evidence in court as they are flawed. As such, they offer no useful info as to whether or not LS is telling the truth.

[Hillary-in-the-Box]

I am no authority on this Sinclair thing. In my personal opinion, the guy is an opportunist, nutty, and running a scam. And he is diverting funds that could go to Hillary's campaign.

I believe that Hillary Clinton can beat Obama on the basis of the issues. This kind of nonsense is bound to pop up. But we don't need to buy into it.

It's dirty pool.

That he is actually asking for our money is disgusting. Ick.

[Hillary-in-the-Box]

There is a lady on MySpace right now that claims to be Hillary Clinton's CURRENT lover.

And Murray's right, this is about "authenticity/sincerity/trustworthiness". Nothing else.

These kinds of scavengers surface during elections. It's sad. And the fact of the matter is we don't need crazy Larry to "help" us win this.

[BooskerD]

There is a lady on MySpace right now that claims to be Hillary Clinton's CURRENT lover.

And Murray's right, this is about "authenticity/sincerity/trustworthiness". Nothing else.

These kinds of scavengers surface during elections. It's sad. And the fact of the matter is we don't need crazy Larry to "help" us win this.

Yes, the Obamamaniacs are all on fire over this "Hillary is bisexual" story, which is a joke and a lie. I believe that one of the benefits of having a woman in office would be that they're much less likely to engage in these little peccadilloes.

[memphis]

Does Larry have witnesses at least to their meeting or better still, someone else that had drug interactions and relations with BO.
At least that would lend some validity to his description of his relationship with BO. That is, unless they have all been paid off.

[BooskerD]

Does Larry have witnesses at least to their meeting or better still, someone else that had drug interactions and relations with BO.
At least that would lend some validity to his description of his relationship with BO. That is, unless they have all been paid off.

Only the mysterious limo driver, whom Larry seems unable to contact. Too many things are not adding up. I'm inclined to agree with Hillary-in-the-box...I think it's a dead end and we don't need it to win.

[sisterrosetta]

May 23, 2008 by zachjonesishome


http://zachjonesishome.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/u-s-diplomacy-and-why-larry-sinclair%e2%80%99s-allegations-of-gay-sex-and-drug-use-must-be-investigated/

EXCERPTS

This allegation, true or not, could very well further damage the reputation of the United States.

A former news reporter and anchor, Delenn states: There’s a reason that polygraphs aren’t accepted as evidence in most American courtrooms: they’re grossly inaccurate. And in Larry Sinclair’s case, keep in mind; the (unbiased) computer passed Sinclair. It was the human examiner who considered SOME of Sinclair’s responses untruthful… the human examiner who a) hooked the machine up incorrectly; and b) got his supposed doctorate from an online diploma mill. Additional, the group that organized the polygraph and promised to make the complete polygraph available failed to do so.

Taken together with the new allegations that have come out regarding Sen. Obama and gay sex, the flawed polygraph looks even more suspect. There is now, once again, the possibility that Mr. Sinclair is telling the truth. The statements from Rev. Manning that Sen. Obama and Rev. Wright are closet homosexuals, the statement from a person on Mr. Sinclair’s blog that one of Obama’s pilots saw Obama kissing a male aid, and a Chicago restaurant owner learning from her patrons of Obama being on the “down low”- all tend to support Mr. Sinclair’s allegations. Mr. Sinclair and Rev. Manning claim to have evidence proving their allegations, but they each say they are waiting on disclosing the evidence. (It might be that advice of counsel or political timing is the reason.) However, it seems as though the main street media is determined to keep these allegations from seeing the light of day and truth.

[mooaks]

I'm not hip to street language, tell me what being on the "down low" means. I think I know what it means. Does it mean accepting falacio?? I'm not sure I spelled it correctly.

[sisterrosetta]

Fellatio

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fellatio

[mooaks]

Thanks, sorry,

[Liz007]

I'm surprised I havent read anything but LS's blog was updated a two days ago...tomorrows some big announcement..

[sisterdo]

or heard?

[Bad Kitty]

Yes. Today is the day. :D Does anyone know how we can see/hear it?

[Mrsawd]

Larry did not fail the poly graph the Man that reported he fail was not even a legal reader of the test according to the way I understand this Larry has the papers or the Attorney has the papers to prove him self! = paid off ass to make Larry look bad infact I believe it was told that they also had some thing to tight that hurt and was told and did not correct that problem either

Either way polygraph does not proveany thing because they are not admissable in a court of Law since they can be altered and mis read this


At first when Larry started trying to get this out about Obama he was not trying to get the homo part out but when questioned they pretty much forced this out !


the other issues are about the 3 murdered especially phone conversations with Donald Young I believe Larry may have recorded ! I know he submitted phone numbers and times Hotel records and all and still was getting ignored !

Obama does not want this all to come out today ! So I would say be prepared if His terrorist friends get invovled even thou FBI and securities are invovled ! It is hard to tell what is next !

[larse]

Please go to No Quarter and read this post.
It is all about Larry and his press conference.
http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/22/free-larry-sinclair-obama%e2%80%99s-political-prisoner/