PDA

View Full Version : (July 10, 2008): "Ohio Mulls Ban on Voting Machine Sleepovers" (AP via YAHOO News)


santafegal
07-10-2008, 10:56 PM
Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner announced plans in February to scrap the practice known as "sleepovers" because of security concerns. But her proposal is being attacked by county elections officials who argue that the custom makes it easier to transport machines to polling sites.

Brunner has frequently referred to a Licking County poll worker who took a machine home for safekeeping and improperly voted on it, fearing there wouldn't be enough time on Election Day.
Election officials say safeguards prevent such a tampered machine from being used at the polls because it would not have the required vote tally of "zero" before voting began.


Sleepovers are prevalent in Ohio counties that use touch-screen voting machines and are sometimes used in counties with machines that scan paper ballots. The practice enables poll workers to pick up voting machines and other equipment such as memory cards in the days before the election, keep them at home and then take them to polling locations on Election Day.


One alternative would be to lock voting machines inside polling places for a few days, Cunningham said.
"You got two choices — you're either going to have a machine unattended at a polling location for a few days or you are going to have a machine in the hands of a poll worker," he said. "Pick your poison."


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080710/ap_on_el_ge/voting_machine_sleepovers_1

I never heard of people taking voting machines home? There has be be a better option, security-wise.

Sandy in PA
07-10-2008, 11:11 PM
How the heck do you take a voting machine home? They are huge! At least the ones here are.

joeysky18
07-10-2008, 11:12 PM
I can't believe that this is happening in the greatest country of the free world.

My Gawd! This election is really an eye opener.

Mrsawd
07-10-2008, 11:18 PM
Mighty interesting !

underpaidnurse
07-10-2008, 11:20 PM
hmmmmm...seeing a way for the idgits of the DNC to call foul when McCain trounces Obama in Nov.

(this is said only if Hillary does not rightfully take the nomination in Denver)

Meg
07-10-2008, 11:22 PM
How the heck do you take a voting machine home? They are huge! At least the ones here are.


That's the first thing I said too!:D

santafegal
07-10-2008, 11:24 PM
I'm a Precinct Judge and in my town I just pick up the keys to the voting machine the night before LOL.

lynfreedom
07-11-2008, 03:25 AM
my biggest fear...what he will have his thugs trained to do in Nov

Paul F. Villarreal
07-11-2008, 03:47 AM
You go, Jennifer Brunner!

Just say no to ACORN tampering and Gary, Indiana mayors trying to steal elections.

If BaDork is nominated, we need every single step taken to prevent him from stealing the election. The ACORN clowns are vote frauders extraordinaire and all measures must be taken to prevent Chicago-style tactics being used on November 4th if the coupists get their man.

Amanda2489
07-11-2008, 03:57 AM
our voting machines here aren't that big, really no bigger that a laptop computer so I guess they could take one like that home. But it seems kinda strange to do so. I never heard of such.

santafegal
07-11-2008, 10:08 PM
The first thing I thought of was someone hacking the machine or tampering with it somehow to skew results on election day.

Borlah
07-11-2008, 10:15 PM
I gotta give props to my Sec. of State. She has been busting her butt since being elected to try to fix these kind of voting problems here in Ohio. It hasn't made her the most popular person in Columbus and I truely respect her for not backing down. She stated very early in her term that she would be voting by absentee ballot and suggested that all voters do the same. She has got her work cut out for her cleaning up after Ken Blackwell.

ggreen
07-12-2008, 12:24 AM
In Ohio the machines are delivered to the polling place the day before the election. The presiding judge (ranking poll worker in each precinct) has the job of picking up a package with paperwork and voting materials the night before. The seals on the machines are checked by all workers (reps from both parties) as part of the opening duties in the morning. As someone mentioned, the count has to be at zero. It really isn't sinister at all and I think leaving the machines in a polling place for too long before the election would actually be less secure. I've worked as both a poll worker and presiding judge and feel the safeguards in place are very practical and sufficient.

:)

Borlah
07-12-2008, 12:57 AM
What do you know about the "sleepovers" ggreen? Elections are big things and I don't see any reason why a rep from both parties or group of reps couldn't babysit the machines if need be.

ggreen
07-12-2008, 10:46 AM
I took the term "sleepover" to refer to the idea of the machines being left overnight. Though having reps from both parties stay overnight with the machines wouldn't be a bad idea, finding people to do so might be extremely difficult. Despite strong efforts to recruit more poll workers and observers, it's a constant struggle to fill the positions. I'm not sure it would be possible to find folks willing to spend the night in school gyms, fire stations, and the other types of buildings used (especially considering the high percentage of retirees/seniors that work the polls).
:)