The Shame File - Documenting Vile Comments written about Hillary (Pass over this thread if you are not comfortable with such content)

[CGP]

Taylor Marsh exposes her hate mail. So we need to start expose that which is thrown at Hillary!

We have all seen them - the viscious, vile, slanderous comments against Hillary across the Internet. Time to start documenting the hate and exposing it. The aim of this thread will be to collect examples of the kind of hate material that is out there being spread by Obama supporters. There is plenty to find and report so please get busy and report back to this thread.

A few requests:

1) Provide a link to the source webpage for any quote you submit

2) Clearly distinguish the code by placing it within inverete commas or italics or the blue shaded background (if you know how to do this).

[Les33]

These comments were on an article about Chelsea saying none of your business to a Monika question.


http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/25/chelsea-clinton-dismisses-lewinsky-question/#legal



Hillary Lies! March 25th, 2008 6:05 pm ET

Hah, looks like she got into a bit of a sticky situation there. lol. Welcome to politics!





{YuriGod March 25th, 2008 6:09 pm ET

This ugly bit*h is a product of incest.

Bill and Hillary are brothers and sisters. Bill f*cked his sister hillary and chelsea was born}




Matt G March 25th, 2008 6:10 pm ET

It's everyone's business because your twisted family is trying to force their way back into our lives.

Way to avoid any difficult questions there Chels.

The duckies, puppies, and bunny tour - coming soon to a town near you to paint a pretty picture over a canvas of filth and sin.




BJ March 25th, 2008 6:13 pm ET

why chelsea avoids monica issue,she should tell the truth of her adulterous father,call aspade a aspade not abig spoon,clintons are liars thats why obama is shinning.




F March 25th, 2008 6:21 pm ET

Ouch!! I think Chelsea will be the only Clinton woman who has a chance to run for POTUS. She answered that question better then her mother could have. Could you imagine what the bi-polar Hillary would of done.




This is CNN's comment policy:

CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters.

[Brooke]

OMG..did that get through?

[Optixmom]

I will need to thicken my skin or this thread has the potential to make me lose my lunch.

[CGP]

I will need to thicken my skin or this thread has the potential to make me lose my lunch.

Optixmom - the filth needs to be exposed. It's causing so much damage.

But just pass over this thread if it's a bit much. ;)

[CGP]

These are the kinds comments that CNN deems acceptable...

[greekme1105]

:( I went to a sign rally here in Orlando, this month...There were so many positive cheers and thumbs up.. A few obscene gestures. What hurt terribly, was when a young man rolled down his window and shouted, "Hillary is a f...... c...! :(:(:(
All of us gasped...It just hurt. It is so very sad how some are so ignorant and uninformed!:confused::(

Hillary... is a F...n Champion!!!:eek::D

[Brooke]

I'm going to be doing a visibility thing up the street on Thursday morning before work. Hopefully I won't have anything to add from that afterwards but if I do, I'll post them.

[Imwithhillary]

But just pass over this thread if it's a bit much. ;)

Thanks, I will. :(

[PuppyDogMom]

Boy, is this stuff hard to read. But as hard as it is to read, it does seem to show how inconsiderate, crude, crass, (shall I go on?) the Obama supporters seem to be.

Do you have a plan for distributing this, Murray? Or did you already say that and I need to go back and read again?

[CGP]

Boy, is this stuff hard to read. But as hard as it is to read, it does seem to show how inconsiderate, crude, crass, (shall I go on?) the Obama supporters seem to be.

Do you have a plan for distributing this, Murray? Or did you already say that and I need to go back and read again?


Not sure yet. Just a new idea. But I think it's useful to start recording what the major media sites allow to be posted about Hillary Clinton on their websites.

[EH]

Whoa, CNN sure is classy - what do they do for an encore? Would they call the FBI and have the IP checked on anyone who used the N word?

Folks, let's not get knocked down by the pettiness and vulgarity - we've grown accustomed to this sort of filth from the Obama camp. Time to fight back with facts and issues without stooping down to their level.

As a matter of fact, here's my latest comment on the NY Times Caucus blog:

Memo to all those Obamanots who are clinging for dear life to the fact that Hillary Clinton “lied” about Bosnia: she at least could say that she’s been there, like she’s been to many other countries in Europe - that same Europe your candidate has never been to. No wonder he never held a single committee hearing at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s Subcommittee on European Affairs, even if he was the chairman - what was he going to talk about?

Get over it.

— Posted by Conchita Vecchio

[Charlie Brown]

OMG...... this is why I stay here on this forum...These statements cut me like a knife...I hope whatever your idea is it works.

[evolin]

Maybe we should send a detective to each site to record.
The huffington post is one of the worst.
Then they refuse posts by Hillary supporters.

[Brooke]

I scrolled through from the bottom up and the comments didn't seem so bad, people were giving Chelsea props and the thing at the bottom says CNN has "closed" comments so I guess they felt they shouldn't have let some of those awful ones through.

[CGP]

I scrolled through from the bottom up and the comments didn't seem so bad, people were giving Chelsea props and the thing at the bottom says CNN has "closed" comments so I guess they felt they shouldn't have let some of those awful ones through.

They always close the comments - it is standard. And all comments are moderated and approved before they make the final cut. So those disgusting comments you see above were APPROVED by CNN for publication - they didn't "get through" by accident - CNN AUTHORIZED their publication before they appeared in the final list of moderated comments.

[CGP]

Maybe we should send a detective to each site to record.
The huffington post is one of the worst.
Then they refuse posts by Hillary supporters.

Might be an idea to have a separate "shame file" for each site - this one can be for CNN (political ticker).

Others that approve/allow comments and which could have separate threads:

- huffington post
- abc news (generally not as bad)
- digg.com (horrific)
- democratic underground (horrific)
- myspace (horrific)
- youtube (horrific)

Oh, by the way, those 5 comments fearuted above in this first shamel file are SUPER MILD versions of what I see daily. These are just some basic starters!

[Charlie Brown]

They always close the comments - it is standard. And all comments are moderated and approved before they make the final cut. So those disgusting comments you see above were APPROVED by CNN for publication - they didn't "get through" by accident - CNN AUTHORIZED their publication before they appeared in the final list of moderated comments.

Send them to Fox...make a huge stink about standards and get Fox to attack CNN...I suppose fox is bad too but I bet they clean up there act if they see us making a point about it...

[KYWildcatFan]

CNN violated their own posting rules. I think they should be called out on it. As a matter of fact I feel so strongly that they should be called out on it that I am going to make it a point to call them out on it.

I will begin emailing everyday the comments that they allow to be posted that violate their posting rules. Hmm maybe that will work. I wont say I am pro Hillary or they will just ignore me. I will instead tell them that I am a concerned online viewer who is very concerned at what they are allowing to be posted.

I don't know if it will work but I will give it a good try!

If Hillary can take this everyday, all day, I think we owe it to her to be as classy as she is and fight back in a positive way. Not bashing BO or his supporters. We need to be calm and civil as she is. We need to fight the media with their own tools. We fight negative bloggers with positive blogging, if possible using links to support our comments. We make calls for her to voters. We call all media outlets when they slant their reporting. We email everyone, whether we think they will listen or not, telling them why they should vote for Hillary. We stand untied at the polls. And we make contributions every chance we get.

[Disfranchised]

Might be an idea to have a separate "shame file" for each site - this one can be for CNN (political ticker).

Others that approve/allow comments and which could have separate threads:

- huffington post
- abc news (generally not as bad)
- digg.com (horrific)
- democratic underground (horrific)
- myspace (horrific)
- youtube (horrific)

Oh, by the way, those 5 comments fearuted above in this first shamel file are SUPER MILD versions of what I see daily. These are just some basic starters!

Don;t forget firstread which is msnbc. The most shameless of all.

[Brooke]

I had no idea they just close comments, I hardly go over there anymore. My bad.

Thing is, the person they have moderating them is probably just a punk kid. But at least we could probably get him fired.

[ALL4HILLARY]

Comment to this:
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/DNC_Official_Clinton_Pursuing_The_Tonya_Harding_Op tion_2

(comment #154)
by Lephtovermeet 2 hours ago
Because she's a cu*t



by keyboardduder 12 hours ago
I ran into some hillary supporters in Philly yesterday. They were on a corner holding their signs, "honk for hillary". A bunch of older/middle age white people. Needless to say I walked right past them and yelled SHES A LIAR! It felt good.

[Les33]

CNN violated their own posting rules. I think they should be called out on it. As a matter of fact I feel so strongly that they should be called out on it that I am going to make it a point to call them out on it.

I will begin emailing everyday the comments that they allow to be posted that violate their posting rules. Hmm maybe that will work. I wont say I am pro Hillary or they will just ignore me. I will instead tell them that I am a concerned online viewer who is very concerned at what they are allowing to be posted.

I don't know if it will work but I will give it a good try!

If Hillary can take this everyday, all day, I think we owe it to her to be as classy as she is and fight back in a positive way. Not bashing BO or his supporters. We need to be calm and civil as she is. We need to fight the media with their own tools. We fight negative bloggers with positive blogging, if possible using links to support our comments. We make calls for her to voters. We call all media outlets when they slant their reporting. We email everyone, whether we think they will listen or not, telling them why they should vote for Hillary. We stand untied at the polls. And we make contributions every chance we get.

I emailed them about the incest comment. I was civil.

[YesSheCan]

:( I went to a sign rally here in Orlando, this month...There were so many positive cheers and thumbs up.. A few obscene gestures. What hurt terribly, was when a young man rolled down his window and shouted, "Hillary is a f...... c...! :(:(:(
All of us gasped...It just hurt. It is so very sad how some are so ignorant and uninformed!:confused::(

Hillary... is a F...n Champion!!!:eek::D
It was probably just a non-political kid being obnoxious in public as a dare to his buddies.

[hillary4change]

I will do what it takes. I have had it.
This is the worst election in my memory.
I have seen some pretty horrific things as well.
4hillary4ever

[Linda C]

:( I went to a sign rally here in Orlando, this month...There were so many positive cheers and thumbs up.. A few obscene gestures. What hurt terribly, was when a young man rolled down his window and shouted, "Hillary is a f...... c...! :(:(:(
All of us gasped...It just hurt. It is so very sad how some are so ignorant and uninformed!:confused::(

Hillary... is a F...n Champion!!!:eek::D

Ya according to the good Reverend Wright..

Hillary has never been called the "N"word....what a relief that is

[Rita Lyn]

I read those comments and they were horrible! SO, I sent them in an email to Bill O'Reilly. Let's see if he airs them!

[Disfranchised]

Please everyone put a screenshot instead of quoting!

[Disfranchised]

http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/ll26/shame_on_you_media/huffingtonpost1.jpg

[Rita Lyn]

http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/ll26/shame_on_you_media/huffingtonpost1.jpg

When I sent my email to O'Reilly, I included the link and I copy and pasted the blog comments from CNN. He has been good about attacking the Daily Kos and Huffington sites.

I also admitted that I was a proud Hillary Gal and I told him that I started watching him because of the way CNN and MSNBC treated Obama like a god. I also told him that WHEN Hillary gets the nomination, all those Obama supporters will vanish from CNN and MSNBC in a heartbeat. Oddly enough, I posted that same statement on the CNN Cafferty blog and guess what? It got deleted. I guess I was too "vulgar". I am such a bad girl!

[joeysky18]

Great Idea Murray. I'll collect and post them here.

[Rita Lyn]

I just posted three comments on the Cafferty blog. I was surprised. He only had one question concerning Hillary. This is how I replied:
Rita Lyn March 26th, 2008 2:18 pm ET
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Jack, of COURSE he’s right! It took this country from 1776 to 1920 to recognize women as people. Up until that time, women were thought of as uneducated, too weak and emotional to make a rational decision concerning politics. Boy! Were you Guys wrong! I am woman, hear me roar!

I did not add a "Go Hillary" for fear of deletion. I just wanted to get my point across that a woman CAN be president!

[no_more_bush]

I've seen the saying "vote with your riffle" plastered over a photo of a sharp shooter, this has actually been used against both Hillary and Obama.

[CGP]

Screen capture images are the most effective way to do this - good idea disnfranchised!! They can easily be hosted via a photobucket account.

[tcbwriter]

This is CNN's comment policy:

CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters

Hmmmmm . . . interesting that we can't get our comments posted on CNN.com, yet these vile messages are right there in full view! But then again the policy says "remain respectful of other authors and commenters". Apparently you can call a politician and a woman any repulsive name you can think of, without an ounce of respect and that's okay, so long as you don't say anything mean about a "commentator." No, No, No . . .

I wonder if these Obama supporters are the ones making Michelle so proud of America for the first time in her adult life. As for me, it's these people that make me ashamed to call them fellow countrymen . . .

[CGP]

CNN violated their own posting rules. I think they should be called out on it. As a matter of fact I feel so strongly that they should be called out on it that I am going to make it a point to call them out on it.

I will begin emailing everyday the comments that they allow to be posted that violate their posting rules. Hmm maybe that will work. I wont say I am pro Hillary or they will just ignore me. I will instead tell them that I am a concerned online viewer who is very concerned at what they are allowing to be posted.


Please do this - great action to take!

[tcbwriter]

Please everyone put a screenshot instead of quoting!
I thought I was fairly computer savvy but you got me on this one.

How do get a "screenshot" - and, BTW, why is it better?

[SD]

the link from the original post is gone now. i guess they decided to clean it up.

am i the only one who cannot grasp michelle as first lady? also, i have an intuition that she is really "the power behind that throne", telling obama what to do, when to do it. she makes me just cringe every time she speaks. i keep expecting time to go in reverse. :(

[Disfranchised]

I thought I was fairly computer savvy but you got me on this one.

How do get a "screenshot" - and, BTW, why is it better?

When you quote they can take that comment down and there will be no real proof. When you take a screenshot like the one I did with huffingtonpost today there is noway to question it. It shows the website and the comment clearly.
To take a screenshot-
1.Go to the page you want to take a screenshot of.

Mac OS X
Pressing Command-Shift-3 takes a screenshot of the entire screen, hold down the control key with the rest of the keyboard shortcut, the pictures are copied to the clipboard.

Microsoft Windows
Pressing the Print Screen key captures a screenshot of the entire desktop area, and places it in the clipboard. Pressing the combination of Alt-Print Screen captures only the current active window.
By default, Windows does not save the screenshot to an image file; the user is required to paste the image into a separate imaging program (such as Microsoft Paint). Open your paint program. click edit. click paste. Now you can save it by giving it a name. I upload all my screenshots on a free picture hosting website such as photobucket.

You are all set to use your screenshots.

[Carolyn]

From a NY Times blog today:


"What is it about this nasty, lying, and mean spirited woman that makes her feel compelled to humiliate, embarras, downgrade, and bad mouth MEN, who dare to oppose her whims?"

— Posted by roger millerr


I responded, "Men like you, roger, men like you."
:D

[Carolyn]

If you Google Roger Stone Hillary Clinton and C**T, you'll find this article. This is no joke. Stone is the charming fellow who led the Feds to Spitzer, incidentally -- no doubt at the behest of our Republican State Senate leader....

Roger Stone, Hillary Clinton, and ‘Citizens United Not Timid’
Posted January 24th, 2008


"You may not know Roger Stone, but I’m sure you know his work. He is a right-wing hatchet-man extraordinaire, brazenly cynical, and free of any sense of decency or honor in a political career that began as Nixon’s “youngest Watergate dirty trickster.” Various reporters have referred to him as “a state of the art sleaze-ball,” “an extreme rightwing sleazeball,” and the “boastful black prince of Republican sleaze.” (You might notice the common thread among the decriptions.)

Stone has, to one extent or another, dabbled in at least eight presidential campaigns, including Reagan’s, Bush’s, Dole’s, and Bush’s, including helping lead street protests in Florida against a recount in 2000.

Now Stone has a new project — called “Citizens United Not Timid.” If you take the first letter of each word, you get a sense of what Stone’s up to.

Stone wants everyone to understand the mission of the organization, simply and elegantly captured in its artwork, which Stone shows us. It features a red inverted triangle at the bottom of which, is a blue triangle with a white star in the middle. At first glance, it kind of looks like the Puerto Rican flag, or Captain America’s martini glass. Stone designed it himself, and on second glance, it’s meant to whisper, not scream, “special flower.”

The text underneath it reads “Citizens United Not Timid, a 527 Organization To Educate The American Public About What Hillary Clinton Really Is.” The artwork and text are, it turns out, the entirety of the “education.” Stone says the website will feature an attractive model in the organization’s T-shirt, which can be yours for a “donation” of $25 or more. […]

“The more people go to the site, the more people buy the T-shirts,” Stone explains to the troops. “The more people buy the T-shirts, the more people wear the T-shirts. The more people wear the T-shirts, the more people are educated. Consequently, our mission has been achieved.” Though neither the word itself nor even the acronym is ever mentioned, “it’s one-word education. That’s our mission. No issues. No policy groups. No position papers. This is a simple committee with an unfortunate acronym. Addendums, deletions? Everybody’s down?”

Stone settled on “Citizens United Not Timid,” only after failing to “come up with words for B.I.T.C.H.”

First, on the specifics, Paul Kiel details the 527 chicanery at play here.

Stone walks the Standard’s Matt Labash through how he set up his 527. All that’s needed is a name. He chose Jeff “Noodles” Jones, a local bartender/DJ in Miami, to serve as the group’s chairman. It doesn’t matter that Noodles doesn’t have much of a clue about anything — in fact, that’s the point. As long as he doesn’t have a criminal record (a mistake Stone almost made when selecting a chairman), he’s OK. Voila! Attack group.

“A 527 doesn’t have a wife,” Stone explains. “It doesn’t have a brother-in-law who knows a lot about politics, or a union president who calls and doesn’t like the color of the suit, or bimbo eruptions. It’s the perfect candidate, because it has no personal characteristics.”

No personal characteristics indeed. The group’s IRS filings are studiedly anonymous, disclosing their purpose as “To educate the public about the importance of moral character and integtiry [sic] in those who hold public office.”

Yes, the irony of Stone misspelling “integrity” is worth appreciating in its own right.

And second, I can’t help but wonder if Republicans realize the likelihood of something like this crass and ugly attack backfiring. According to the Weekly Standard piece, Stone wants Democrats to know that “if Hillary is the nominee, a hard 527 rain is going to fall.”

I think Dems know that, but does Stone appreciate what these attacks do among Dems? The Clintons have been well-regarded in Democratic circles for years, but they didn’t become genuine icons until the right-wing smear machine tried to destroy them. Bill Clinton’s popularity among Dems was strong, but it didn’t really move until Newt Gingrich came along, and it didn’t really soar until Ken Starr arrived on the scene.

The Clintons have been blessed, in this sense, by extraordinarily easy-to-loathe enemies, who only help rally the Democratic troops behind the Clintons.

Given this, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if “Citizens United Not Timid” does more to help Hillary than hurt her.'

You got that right!

[HillWill]

The worst comments I've seen have been at digg.com

[HillWill]

http://www.rollingstone.com/nationalaffairs/index.php/2008/03/25/lies-damn-lies-and-mispeakings

From digg.com in response to rolling stone article. This is the worst one, but there are plenty more... I hate even posting this, but you asked for it...


-1 diggs by BinaryDelt 1 hour ago
I ******* hate Hillary Clinton. She cares more about winning than the country, the people in it, or the problems facing it. This is some big ******* beauty contest to her.

**** HILLARY CLINTON.

[joeysky18]

I'm going to save this to use as a banner at Hillary inauguration. :D


Comment by Ken H.
March 26th, 2008 at 11:35 pm
Comment by Patsy
March 26th, 2008 at 11:27 pm

Hillary is done. It is over. The End.
——————————————————————–
yep

[CGP]

Oh, that rolling stone article and the comments infuriated me. He is my response:

http://hillaryclintonforum.net/images/rollingstone1.JPG

[HillWill]

Good job Murray. Were you able to see the full comment by the jerk I posted? At least this website doesn't let you post bad language, so it automatically put astericks in place of the "f" word. But that's what he said. I can't do the copy image thing.
thanks.

[CGP]

Good job Murray. Were you able to see the full comment by the jerk I posted? At least this website doesn't let you post bad language, so it automatically put astericks in place of the "f" word. But that's what he said. I can't do the copy image thing.
thanks.

Yes, I have censored certain swear words from showing up!

[CGP]

http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Hillary_Clinton_is_a_Habitual_Liar_Who_Cannot_Admi t_Fault

DIGG = DISGUSTING

THESE COMMENTS SHOULD MOTIVATE YOU EVEN MORE TO GET OUT AND CAMPAIGN FOR HILLARY!

These are bad so be warned!

http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/images/rollingstonedigg1.JPG (http://digg.com/users/gannondork)

http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/images/rollingstonedigg2.JPG (http://digg.com/users/Freeto114)

http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/images/rollingstonedigg3.JPG (http://digg.com/users/BinaryDelt)


http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/images/rollingstonedigg4.JPG (http://digg.com/users/kuppoppo)

[HillWill]

[sigh] you got 'em. you're doing a great job, Murray. thank you.

[CGP]

[sigh] you got 'em. you're doing a great job, Murray. thank you.

The mysogyny evident in those posts/images, is FUELED by horrendously negative media coverage of hillary clinton and Obama's constact negative attacks. They have BLOOD on their hands for fueling this kind of anti-women hatred.

[VoteSmart]

Can anyone here explain how CNN is blocking your posts? Are you receiving an error message or other warning? I'm very curious as 2 of my CNN comments were posted but with a message "Your comment is awaiting moderation."

Curious if I should be furious......:rolleyes::confused:

[CGP]

Can anyone here explain how CNN is blocking your posts? Are you receiving an error message or other warning? I'm very curious as 2 of my CNN comments were posted but with a message "Your comment is awaiting moderation."

Curious if I should be furious......:rolleyes::confused:

All new posts get that title "awaiting moderation"...If you return later and your post is gone, it means they decided to NOT SHOW YOUR COMMENT. Simple.

[tcbwriter]

When you quote they can take that comment down and there will be no real proof. When you take a screenshot like the one I did with huffingtonpost today there is noway to question it. It shows the website and the comment clearly.
To take a screenshot-
1.Go to the page you want to take a screenshot of.

Mac OS X
Pressing Command-Shift-3 takes a screenshot of the entire screen, hold down the control key with the rest of the keyboard shortcut, the pictures are copied to the clipboard.

Microsoft Windows
Pressing the Print Screen key captures a screenshot of the entire desktop area, and places it in the clipboard. Pressing the combination of Alt-Print Screen captures only the current active window.
By default, Windows does not save the screenshot to an image file; the user is required to paste the image into a separate imaging program (such as Microsoft Paint). Open your paint program. click edit. click paste. Now you can save it by giving it a name. I upload all my screenshots on a free picture hosting website such as photobucket.

You are all set to use your screenshots.
Thank you!

[tcbwriter]

All new posts get that title "awaiting moderation"...If you return later and your post is gone, it means they decided to NOT SHOW YOUR COMMENT. Simple.
I find my comment is still there hours later but it still says "awaiting moderation". I've never NOT seen that. So I'm never clear if it made it or not.

[CGP]

I find my comment is still there hours later but it still says "awaiting moderation". I've never NOT seen that. So I'm never clear if it made it or not.

Go back a day or two later and you will know for sure!