When the Information is released on Obama's birth certificate, campaign Money, and any illegal dealings, and should the evidence weigh in bad, can we hold the media and DNC for Obstruction of Justice?

[Johnf]

Charges should apply.

You know the information will get out there, some one will leak it or be forced to reveal it.

I suspect there is alot of info out there that is being held back to protect Obama.

[Frances]

They are NOT above the law!

[Johnf]

It seems quite obvious Bill Clinton knew that Obama was born in Kenya, or at the very least was not eligible to become President.

[twobyfour]

I was envisioning an appropriate punishment and have to say... damn! I never thought I had it in me!

You don't want to know! :D:D:D:D

[all I can say is that it is based on levitating on hope and a halo, and ultimately on a change]

[Hillicrat]

I want them all charged. I want Ayers not teaching. Ayers should not be able to EVER influence any one with his communistic ideas ever again.

[Suzan]

Maybe the ACLU will take up the cause on behalf of American voters. Hey, our rights as citizens are being violated. And our liberty is being threatened. Isn't that what they're there for?

[twobyfour]

Maybe the ACLU will take up the cause on behalf of American voters. Hey, our rights as citizens are being violated. And our liberty is being threatened. Isn't that what they're there for?

No. Not really. Their name has nothing to do with their agenda, or rather, their agenda is the opposite of what the name would suggest. It's like German Democratic Republic, there was nothing democratic about it, or North Korean People's Republic--where people have no say how it is run, nor any form of ownership of it whatsoever. By republic they mean there is no king there--which is correct... have you seen ever Kim il Sun or his heir, Kim il Jong, with a crown on his head?

[Kbentleyis]

They may not be above the law, but they're certainly not under it either. No one will do anything. Since this information has been suspect all along, I doubt one word will be said about the whoe fraud.

[foxyladi]

Charges should apply.

You know the information will get out there, some one will leak it or be forced to reveal it.

I suspect there is alot of info out there that is being held back to protect Obama.

bump

[Mrsawd]

Every one should be aware so I post tis again here!
Read this:

http://james4america.wordpress.com/2...ion-he-issued/

October 25, 2008...6:35 pm
Judge Surrick “Received” the Decision He Issued

In the “never-ending” drama that is known as the 2008 Presidential election, there is an appearance that the decision issued yesterday by the Honorable Judge R. Barclay Surrick in the matter of Berg v. Obama might have been SENT to the judge just a short time BEFORE he released the decision.

A fax copy of the decision from Judge Surrick was faxed to Mr. Berg from the Judge’s Chambers, pages 1-36, beginning at 18:09 October 24, 2008, and that is clearly notated by the receiving fax, starting at page 01/36. Page 36/36 is marked 18:16 October 24, 2008. What is interesting is not at the TOP of the fax pages; it is at the bottom.


From Judge Surrick



http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_P2ak2vb2Zv..._102008_Ruling[1]+(2).jpg

At the bottom of each page is a notation from another FAX machine, indicating the date, page number and time. Unlike the pages faxed from Judge Surrick’s fax at 18:09, the “name” of the fax sender is blank, presumably so the sender’s identity could not be seen, and obviously with the sender unaware that the date and time would be stamped on it. The fax began from this mystery fax at 04:55P on October 24, 2008, and ended at 05:11P.

From all appearances, the clerk at Judge Surrick’s office merely took the fax off the machine, the Judge signed it, and it was faxed to Mr. Berg and the other attorneys involved in the case.

Why would a decision from the office of Judge Surrick have “fax date & time” stamp at the BOTTOM of its pages when it is faxed to the Plaintiff and Defendants? And why almost simultaneously were all of the docket links disabled on the case in PACER ( I checked other cases, and they weren’t disabled)?

Is it possible that a former law clerk of Judge Surrick, Christoper B. Seaman, might have wrote the decision? Now an attorney, Mr. Seaman is an attorney at the firm of Sidley, Austin in Chicago. Ironically, this is the same firm that employed Michelle Robinson Obama and Bernardine Dorn (wife of William Ayers), and where Barack Obama met Michelle.


MORE ON THE SITE !


Thanks for the site Post
We need to send this to all the medias !

[brussell]

fixing link from above that doesn't work:

http://james4america.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/judge-surrick-received-the-decision-he-issued/

[brussell]

Maybe the ACLU will take up the cause on behalf of American voters. Hey, our rights as citizens are being violated. And our liberty is being threatened. Isn't that what they're there for?

I think they "own" the ACLU as well.