Richardson: Loyalty to my Country-What crap

[evolin]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/01/AR2008040100885.html?wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter

What a sack of****!

[Annie]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/01/AR2008040100885.html?wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter

What a sack of****!

ditto that and he looks like a sack of potatoes with a moustache.

[NotBamboozled]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/01/AR2008040100885.html?wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter

What a sack of****!

The orignal title was Loyalty to my Chances for being Picked for VP

[SunnyInCal]

Here is an article posted today where Richardson attempts to explain his Obama endorsement.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/01/AR2008040100885.html?hpid=opinionsbox1&hpid=topnews

So now I guess anyone that endorses Hillary is not loyal to the country??

[evolin]

I believe Fox is just giving a scant coverage of Obama's big negatives now and bringing in pundits to trash Hillary.
They are trying to set it up for a Mccain win in my opinion.
Now that makes me want a third party candidate. I am getting so angry at the ganging up on the only qualified candidate running.
These skulking cowards are creeping out of the sewer crevices everywhere.

[Mrsawd]

'I just wonder what the dirt was that Obamas people were going to bring out against him if he did not give Obama his vote !

Seems this is the way he is getting votes !

Filty Dirty Man and this Mans organization !

[Patsy]

Led by political commentator James Carville, who makes a living by being confrontational and provocative, Clinton supporters have speculated about events surrounding this endorsement and engaged in personal attacks and insults.

While I certainly will not stoop to the low level of Mr. Carville, I feel compelled to defend myself against character assassination and baseless allegations.

Well, in writing this, Judas has stooped.

Had he paid attention to James Carville's remarks, it was not that BR did not endorse HRC, but it was his disloyalty in not returning Bill Clinton's phone calls. That was what Carville was referencing.

If Judas loved his country so much, he would never have sold out to such an anti-American hate mongering Politician for the promise of a Cabinet Position or perhaps the VP slot.

Too bad it isn't closer to July 4, because he is the biggest posing Benedict Arnold around.

[Ijane]

Wow! I didn't realize he was still being slammed over his endorsement as I haven't heard his name mentioned since shortly after Easter.

Carville and others say that I owe President Clinton's wife my endorsement because he gave me two jobs.

Spin away, idjit!! You owe the people of your state that voted for you for governor, the same people that voted for Hillary as winner of the New Mexico contest!! What a jerk!!

[SunnyInCal]

Mr. Richardson,

With friends like you, no one needs enemies.

I do not argue that you should have endorsed Hillary because Bill gave you a few jobs.

I do not argue that you should endorse Hillary because Bill is your friend with whom you watched the Super Bowl.

I argue, Sir, that you should have endorsed Hillary because she is the most competent Democratic candidate.

I argue that you should not have endorsed Obama because he will not unify the party. If he were a unifier, would the voters be split between the two candidates? It's like me saying the sky is red and expecting you to believe it's red because I said so. Obama is not a unifier merely because you say he is. Where is the evidence Sir?

Obama ran on words, oh those were borrowed so never mind.

Obama ran on judgment, oh wait, his judgment was to stay in the pews of Rev Wright for 20 years, never mind.

Obama runs on "energy" and "hope", those intangibles that none of his supporters can actually describe and put into words.

I put this to you Sir, and all those who have endorsed Obama. If you want real change, RESIGN. Let new people, completely unexperienced people come in to your position as Governor, and the Senate seats in MASS now held by Kerry and Kennedy.

Then we'll see real change. Of course, change is not always good. Can you imagine every Fortune 500 company being run by people with little or no experience but plenty of "energy" and "hope."

By the way Sir, Hillary does have energy and she does give ME hope. She gives me hope that perhaps this nation can move beyond sexism and gender discrimination. She gives me hope that maybe a woman can lead the greatest country in the world. She gives me hope, not merely because she is a woman, but because she is a competent woman.

Rethink your position and come out with some new arguments about why you endorse Obama.

By the way, I am and will always be loyal to my country Sir, and in so doing I feel obliged to vote for Hillary Clinton.

[SD]

More than anything, to repair the damage done at home and abroad, we must unite as a country. I endorsed Sen. Obama because I believe he has the judgment, temperament and background to bridge our divisions as a nation and make America strong at home and respected in the world again.

how's the weather there in fantasyland? :rolleyes:


In my view, Sen. Obama represents our best hope of replacing division with unity. That is why, out of loyalty to my country, I endorse him for president.

umm, weather must be quite foggy there in fantasyland. ;)

[Fleur]

umm, weather must be quite foggy there in fantasyland.

ROFLMAO :D

[Optixmom]

Mr. Richardson,

With friends like you, no one needs enemies.

I do not argue that you should have endorsed Hillary because Bill gave you a few jobs.

I do not argue that you should endorse Hillary because Bill is your friend with whom you watched the Super Bowl.

I argue, Sir, that you should have endorsed Hillary because she is the most competent Democratic candidate.

I argue that you should not have endorsed Obama because he will not unify the party. If he were a unifier, would the voters be split between the two candidates? It's like me saying the sky is red and expecting you to believe it's red because I said so. Obama is not a unifier merely because you say he is. Where is the evidence Sir?

Obama ran on words, oh those were borrowed so never mind.

Obama ran on judgment, oh wait, his judgment was to stay in the pews of Rev Wright for 20 years, never mind.

Obama runs on "energy" and "hope", those intangibles that none of his supporters can actually describe and put into words.

I put this to you Sir, and all those who have endorsed Obama. If you want real change, RESIGN. Let new people, completely unexperienced people come in to your position as Governor, and the Senate seats in MASS now held by Kerry and Kennedy.

Then we'll see real change. Of course, change is not always good. Can you imagine every Fortune 500 company being run by people with little or no experience but plenty of "energy" and "hope."

By the way Sir, Hillary does have energy and she does give ME hope. She gives me hope that perhaps this nation can move beyond sexism and gender discrimination. She gives me hope that maybe a woman can lead the greatest country in the world. She gives me hope, not merely because she is a woman, but because she is a competent woman.

Rethink your position and come out with some new arguments about why you endorse Obama.

By the way, I am and will always be loyal to my country Sir, and in so doing I feel obliged to vote for Hillary Clinton.

This is fantastic! I hope it got printed...

[YesSheCan]

The orignal title was Loyalty to my Chances for being Picked for VP
Yeah the Judas Guy is just like his master Obamememe -- country means what can it do for me --

[YesSheCan]

Anybody who equates supporting Obama as loyalty to one's country doesn't believe in free elections -- oh, wait, isn't this what the Obama campaign is all about? No free elections? This is another Obama tactic, smokescreen and accuse everyone else of your faults. He is a traitor so he is accusing everyone else of being traitors.

[Tea toaD]

Anybody who equates supporting Obama as loyalty to one's country doesn't believe in free elections -- oh, wait, isn't this what the Obama campaign is all about? No free elections? This is another Obama tactic, smokescreen and accuse everyone else of your faults. He is a traitor so he is accusing everyone else of being traitors.


I agree. Following the silver tongued devil with this garbage is an insult:mad:

[Bless]

Judas would tell you he was loyal to Jesus also :D