PDA

View Full Version : (Apr 7, 2009): "White House invites gay families to Easter event." (Sac Bee)


UKSocialist
04-07-2009, 11:40 PM
http://www.sacbee.com/838/story/1762726.html
The White House is allocating tickets for the upcoming Easter Egg Roll to gay and lesbian parents as part of the Obama administration's outreach to diverse communities.

Families say the gesture shows that the new Democratic administration values them as equal to other families. And for many, being included in the annual tradition - dating to 1878 - renews hope that they will have more support in their quest for equal rights in matters such as marriage and adoption than under the previous administration.

On Tuesday, gays and lesbians gained another victory when Vermont joined Connecticut, Massachusetts and Iowa in giving gay couples the right to marry. In the District of Columbia, the council voted to recognize gay marriages performed in other states.

White House officials said that tickets for Monday's Easter Egg Roll event were distributed to gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender organizations, but did not specify how many or to which ones. Representatives from Family Equality Council, Human Rights Campaign, National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and other groups confirmed they were invited and encouraged to have their members participate.

"The Obama administration actually reached out to us as an organization, and said we want gay families there, and they are an important part of the American family fabric," said Jennifer Chrisler, executive director of the Boston-based Family Equality Council, which is helping spearhead the effort to organize families to attend.

Chrisler said Tuesday she expects more than 100 gay and lesbian-headed families to take part in the egg roll.

Overall, officials are gearing up for a bigger turnout than ever before, with families arriving from 45 states and the District of Columbia, said Semonti Mustaphi, deputy press secretary to Mrs. Obama. The majority of egg roll tickets were offered to the public online.

Alan Bernstein, a single gay father, is flying to Washington from West Hollywood, Calif., with his 5-year-old son Issac to participate. His 3-year-old twin daughters will stay with their grandparents. It will be Bernstein and his son's first time at the egg roll.

"I don't think to a 5-year-old it's that extraordinary, but to me it is," said the 43-year-old planning commissioner, calling the invitation an honor.

It's not the first time gay and lesbian-headed families will participate.

In 2006 during the Bush administration, more than 100 gay parents attended the egg roll in part to make the statement that they should be welcome. Some conservatives accused gays and lesbians of trying to "crash" the event and turn it into forum for ideological politicking.
This year already feels different, said Colleen Gillespie of Brooklyn, who helped spark the 2006 effort.

"We feel so welcomed and embraced, and that in a very real way, I think we can just go as a family and enjoy it," said the 42-year-old assistant professor at New York University's school of medicine, who is attending with her wife and their daughters, Ella and Zelda. "We don't have to fight for our right to exist and be treated fairly."

Leah McElrath Renna, managing partner at a D.C. communications firm, agreed. She attended the event in 2006 and 2007 with her partner, Cathy McElrath Renna, and their now 3-year-old daughter, Rosemary.

"Under Bush, it felt a bit like we were crashing our own party. But this year it feels like we're equally honored guests," Leah McElrath Renna, 44, said. "It's more celebratory."

Rosemary is particularly excited to see the Easter bunny again and already has planned her outfit: A yellow polka-dotted dress and a new straw hat with a pink band.

"I'm looking forward to seeing the joy on my daughter's face when she sees the Easter bunny," she said. "And seeing the White House in the background and knowing that America and the future that she lives in will be a more perfect place than it is now."


Progress may be slow but there is at least certainly progress to celebrate!
Further proof in my opinion the Dems, out of the two major parties, are the gay friendly party.

TheTaoOfBill
04-07-2009, 11:56 PM
Murray you were looking for some sign that Obama respects gay rights...It might be a small gesture but it's a start and it gives me a bit more confidence he will have a major gay rights accomplishment in his first term.

mavfin
04-08-2009, 12:00 AM
Murray you were looking for some sign that Obama respects gay rights...It might be a small gesture but it's a start and it gives me a bit more confidence he will have a major gay rights accomplishment in his first term.

We can hope you're right, Tao. It could also be an empty gesture, with nothing real to follow. I'll believe it's real when I see it.

CGP
04-08-2009, 12:17 AM
It's a good thing, yes.

But let's not get carried away. This article today from The Advocate states the situation pretty well. And the silence of the current administration on gay rights issues is less about Obama, and more about the unpopularity (politically) of any federal politician/party openly and directly showing support for gay rights and gay marriage - doing so has never been a vote winner:

The White House Office of Missed Opportunity (http://www.advocate.com/exclusive_detail_ektid77944.asp)

TheTaoOfBill
04-08-2009, 12:30 AM
It's a good thing, yes.

But let's not get carried away. This article today from The Advocate states the situation pretty well. And the silence of the current administration on gay rights issues is less about Obama, and more about the unpopularity (politically) of any federal politician/party openly and directly showing support for gay rights and gay marriage - doing so has never been a vote winner:

The White House Office of Missed Opportunity (http://www.advocate.com/exclusive_detail_ektid77944.asp)

You've got a point. Which is why he can't just come out guns a blazing on this issue. But through gestures like this he can possibly add a human face to gay families and make people realize they aren't so bad after all. Combine this with the growing discussion in state governments and we might actually get somewhere with the national opinion on gay marriage.

mavfin
04-08-2009, 12:31 AM
Combine this with the growing discussion in state governments and we might actually get somewhere with the national opinion on gay marriage.

Did you ever think *Iowa* would be one of the states to go in the first five?

CGP
04-08-2009, 12:37 AM
You've got a point. Which is why he can't just come out guns a blazing on this issue. But through gestures like this he can possibly add a human face to gay families and make people realize they aren't so bad after all. Combine this with the growing discussion in state governments and we might actually get somewhere with the national opinion on gay marriage.

Yes, given the broader context the approach to "change" in this particular area has to considered carefully.

CGP
04-08-2009, 12:37 AM
Did you ever think *Iowa* would be one of the states to go in the first five?

No. I had no idea it was even close.

mavfin
04-08-2009, 12:40 AM
No. I had no idea it was even close.

I want you to realize that New England and California are sort of abstract places to me. I know they exist, I can read about them, see the news from them, but I've never lived there/been there other than on vacation.

I grew up next door to Iowa. I have relatives in Iowa. That makes it a lot more 'real' to me. Also, it wasn't a 'panel of liberal judges' that did this. Check who appointed that court in Iowa, and the record of the judge that wrote the opinion. I think that's change, if you look at it more than superficially.

CGP
04-08-2009, 12:55 AM
I grew up next door to Iowa. I have relatives in Iowa. That makes it a lot more 'real' to me. Also, it wasn't a 'panel of liberal judges' that did this. Check who appointed that court in Iowa, and the record of the judge that wrote the opinion. I think that's change, if you look at it more than superficially.

I know. And I think that reality is all the more shocking for some of the right-wingers having a nervous breakdown over the Iowa ruling. :thumbsup:

Jester
04-08-2009, 12:57 AM
This just ain't right. Nothing says I'm all man than hunting for eggs painted all colors of the rainbow. I don't take kindly to Obama questioning my juevos. What next? Gay people at a the White House Halloween costume party? I mean some things are just sacred.

TheTaoOfBill
04-08-2009, 01:32 AM
This just ain't right. Nothing says I'm all man than hunting for eggs painted all colors of the rainbow. I don't take kindly to Obama questioning my juevos. What next? Gay people at a the White House Halloween costume party? I mean some things are just sacred.

He should invite black families to hide-the-malt-liquor-in-the-watermelon-patch day

Jester
04-08-2009, 02:38 AM
He should invite black families to hide-the-malt-liquor-in-the-watermelon-patch day

[-X

That's just racist. Besides, they will be needed on Labor Day. Ok, now I feel dirty.

Hopefully the gay couples aren't paraded around.

Horizon
04-08-2009, 03:59 AM
[-X

That's just racist. Besides, they will be needed on Labor Day. Ok, now I feel dirty.

Hopefully the gay couples aren't paraded around.
Like a Gay Pride Parade?

Sorry, I could NOT pass that one up, since we were in this vein here!
I think its nice they made this gesture, and I am confident they will hold to the invite.

Jester
04-08-2009, 04:21 AM
Like a Gay Pride Parade?


Glad I wasn't too subtle.

foxyladi
04-08-2009, 11:05 AM
now thats real good news...:thumbsup:

hobbitt
04-09-2009, 10:06 AM
Progress may be slow but there is at least certainly progress to celebrate!
Further proof in my opinion the Dems, out of the two major parties, are the gay friendly party.

Celebrations might be premature. Don't forget The Haircut during the Chicago parade. And the Unseen Gene Robinson.

foxyladi
04-09-2009, 10:38 AM
We can hope you're right, Tao. It could also be an empty gesture, with nothing real to follow. I'll believe it's real when I see it.

me too...