PDA

View Full Version : 5-15-09 "President Palin’s First 100 Days" National Review - Humor


smiledr
05-16-2009, 02:15 AM
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MDU4NDI5MjgxZmRjZTY4ZGFlOTA5M2U2MmY2NDA2Y2M=#mo re

President Palin’s First 100 Days
A near disaster.

By Victor Davis Hanson

WASHINGTON (AP) — The first 100 days of the Palin presidency, according to a consensus of media commentators, have proven a near disaster. Perhaps it was Palin’s scant two years’ experience in a major government position that has eroded her gravitas, or maybe it was her flirty reliance on looks and informal chit-chat. In any case, the press has had a field day, and it is hard to see how President Palin can ever recover from the Quayle/potatoe syndrome. Here is a roundup of this week’s pundit mockery.

LET THEM EAT MOOSE
“Ted Stevens may have gotten off,” wrote Bob Herbert in the New York Times, “but he taught our Sarah something first — like using $100-a-pound beef for her state dinners. And what’s this $50 mil for her inauguration gala? Since when do you fly in your favorite pizza-maker from across the country on our dime? Or send the presidential 747 for a spin over the Big Apple for a third-of-a-million-dollar joyride? Does Palin think she’s still in Alaska and has to have everything flown in from the South 48 by jumbo jet?”

WASILLA CHIC
Also in the Times, Gail Collins weighed in on the already-tired yokelism of the new commander in chief. “What we’re getting is Wasilla chic. That’s what we’re getting. She arrives in the Oval Office, and first thing sends back Blair’s gift of the Churchill bust as if it’s a once-worn Penney’s outfit. Then she gives the Brits some unwatchable DVDs as a booby prize — as if she idled the old Yukon and ran into Target’s sale aisle. Did Sarah send Bristol into Wal-Mart back in Anchorage for that ‘engraved’ iPod for the queen? And what’s this don’t-bow-to-the-queen stuff, but curtsy for a Saudi sheik? Maybe that explains why she brags to Stephanopoulos about her ‘Muslim faith.’ So far, the best things going for her are Todd’s biceps.”

IT'S THE MATH, STUPID!
“Well,” lectured Paul Krugman, again in the Times, “we were worried that they didn’t teach math at Idaho U., and now we know for sure they don’t. Is it $1.6 trillion, $1.7 trillion, or $2 trillion in red ink this year? Are we supposed to be impressed that she offers ‘fiscal sobriety’ by cutting 0.003 percent of the budget? She gives out money to those who don’t pay taxes and calls it a tax cut. And now Queen Sarah tells us that in four years she’ll ‘halve’ the deficit, as if she hasn’t borrowed another $5 trillion in the meantime. Does she think we’re morons? How many ‘Drill, baby, drill!’ oil wells can she tap into up there in Alaska to pay for the extra $11 trillion in debt she’s saddling us with?”

WORSE THAN 'NUCULAR'
ABC’s Katie Couric summed up the general disappointment with the president’s communication skills. “I tried to warn the American people in that interview a few years back what they would get if they voted for her. Let’s face it: She’s a walking embarrassment. I mean just count ’em up: The mayor of Wasilla thinks Austrians speak some lingo called ‘Austrian.’ Then she tries her hand at Spanish and comes up with some concoction, ‘Cinco de Cuatro.’ Next thing she’ll walk into the window of the Oval Office and expect it to open — oops, she’s already done that. No wonder that when her Teleprompter stalls, she shuts her mouth until it catches up. I’m surprised she managed to get sworn in. And did she think that tasteless ‘Special Olympics’ slur was funny? Or making fun of octogenarian Nancy Reagan’s séances? No wonder Wanda Sykes feels at home.”

ANCHORAGE STYLE
A “dragon lady in heels” is what President Palin is, according to the NYT’s Frank Rich. “Don’t fall for this pageant nice-girl stuff. Our former beauty queen is a ward hack. Look at her nominations. Can’t Palin find anyone who has paid his taxes — or do they simply ignore that stuff in no-tax Alaska? Does ‘No more lobbyists’ mean ‘More lobbyists than ever’? Her chief performance overseer doesn’t perform too well herself — and, like Daschle, Geithner, and the rest, skips out on her taxes. When Palin brags about fiscal sobriety, it really means record deficits. In Sarahland, not wanting to take over banks and car companies translates into, ‘She already has.’ Highest ethical standards equates to ‘There are none.’ Calling herself the VA president means she’s just told vets to use their own health insurance.”

GUTTER TRASH
“Pretty crude, pretty petty,” Sally Quinn sighed in the Washington Post. “No manners at all. Does our new mom in chief think it’s neat to laugh when her court jester at the correspondents’ dinner calls Michael Moore a traitor and a terrorist — and hopes he dies of kidney failure? Is that funny? Ask those on dialysis. Is that what Alaskan hockey moms do — scream out at every talk-show host who hurts their itty-bitty feelings? Limbaugh, Hannity — who will it will be next? Poor old Jim Cramer?”

NEOCON CON
“She’s a Bush clone,” the Times’s Maureen Dowd chimed in. “Bush is out, Palin is in — but we keep getting renditions, military tribunals, wiretaps, e-mail intercepts, Predator drone executions over Pakistan, the same in Iraq, and even more of the same in Afghanistan — all retrofitted with new ‘hope and change’ banalities. I mean, who’s putting Mommy Dearest up to this — Wolfie, Perlie, Cheney?”

TINGLE FOR HUGO?
“There is no foreign policy,” Chris Matthews said on Hardball, his voice dripping with scorn. “She just tours the world and nods, as if her good looks and serial apologies are going to win us a collective tingle abroad. I don’t think Hugo Chávez and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad care much that she’s got great legs and a nice wink. How many times can Ms. Vapid say, ‘We’re sorry’ and ‘Hit that old reset button’ and expect thugs to make nice?”

RACE, ALL THE TIME
Eugene Robinson worried in the Washington Post about Palin’s emphasis on race. “Look, she gets 95 percent of the working-class white vote. She promises next month to talk to the ‘Christian world’ from Estonia, of all places. Hello? She goes to the Summit of the Americas and immediately puts race on the table — as if we are supposed to separate those with European heritage from those without. Then she tells al Arabiyya that she hopes to heal the rift with Europe ‘because of my own shared European heritage that seems to resonate in ways I hadn’t imagined throughout the EU.’ I guess we’re learning that those ‘gaffes’ last year on the campaign trail, like her ‘typical black person’ remark and Todd’s ‘I am finally proud of my country again’ nonsense were not gaffes at all.”

WHERE IS THE PRESS?
Howard Kurtz summed up the press cynicism the best in his Washington Post column. “How long does she think she can keep picking on her right-wing plants in the audience for these softball Q-and-A sessions? I mean, there are only so many pukey ‘What has surprised you the most about this office? What has enchanted you the most about serving in this office?’ questions you can lob.”

mavfin
05-16-2009, 02:37 AM
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

The_Basseteer
05-16-2009, 03:17 AM
smiledr, you beat me to it...I just read this in NRO..thought it was GREAT.

hobbitt
05-16-2009, 03:46 AM
Perfectly penetrating, piercing, and oh so painful to read.

Again, "we told you so."

Laura Cereta
05-16-2009, 02:24 PM
Oh, this is amazing!! And f'ing hilarious! :rotfl: That's exactly how the press would have covered her, not to mention, a lot of other people. It's all about perception...

Funny who I don't see commenting on this thread...

Hey Obama supporters, any thoughts on this??? >:/

Spang
05-16-2009, 02:29 PM
Hey Obama supporters, any thoughts on this??? >:/

No, not really.

Laura Cereta
05-16-2009, 02:41 PM
No, not really.

Wonder why? :rolleyes:

No thoughts on "...using $100-a-pound beef for her state dinners. And what’s this $50 mil for her inauguration gala? Since when do you fly in your favorite pizza-maker from across the country on our dime? Or send the presidential 747 for a spin over the Big Apple for a third-of-a-million-dollar joyride..."???

No opinions on "...arrives in the Oval Office, and first thing sends back Blair’s gift of the Churchill bust as if it’s a once-worn Penney’s outfit. Then [he] gives the Brits some unwatchable DVDs as a booby prize — as if [he] idled the old Yukon and ran into Target’s sale aisle. Did [Obama] go into Wal-Mart back in [Chicago] for that ‘engraved’ iPod for the queen? And what’s this don’t-bow-to-the-queen stuff, but curtsy for a Saudi sheik? Maybe that explains why [he] brags to Stephanopoulos about [his] ‘Muslim faith.’..."???

Nothing to say whatsoever about ...“Well,” lectured Paul Krugman, again in the Times, “we were worried that they didn’t teach math at [Columabia], and now we know for sure they don’t. Is it $1.6 trillion, $1.7 trillion, or $2 trillion in red ink this year? Are we supposed to be impressed that [he] offers ‘fiscal sobriety’ by cutting 0.003 percent of the budget? [He] gives out money to those who don’t pay taxes and calls it a tax cut. And now [King Barry] tells us that in four years [he’ll] ‘halve’ the deficit, as if [he] hasn’t borrowed another $5 trillion in the meantime. Does [he] think we’re morons?...???

And that's just half the article...

All those things sound good, huh? Even if Sarah Palin had done them? :thinking:

Spang
05-16-2009, 02:54 PM
Wonder why? :rolleyes:

This joke clearly wasn't written for people like me. What do you want me to say? That I didn't laugh?

Fine, I didn't laugh.

There, you got me.

devildog
05-16-2009, 03:01 PM
This makes me wonder how Hillary would have been treated.

Laura Cereta
05-16-2009, 03:11 PM
This makes me wonder how Hillary would have been treated.

I don't really wonder... she would have faired better then Palin but would not have gotten Obama's media butt kissing.

Laura Cereta
05-16-2009, 03:15 PM
This joke clearly wasn't written for people like me. What do you want me to say? That I didn't laugh?

Fine, I didn't laugh.

There, you got me.

I don't think the point is whether or not a person laughs. The article makes a very good case for how ridiculous many of Obama's decisions are, decisions that if they had been made by someone else would leave the public and the media frothing at the mouth.

Again, I'll point to this part:


Is it $1.6 trillion, $1.7 trillion, or $2 trillion in red ink this year? Are we supposed to be impressed that [he] offers ‘fiscal sobriety’ by cutting 0.003 percent of the budget? [He] gives out money to those who don’t pay taxes and calls it a tax cut. And now [King Barry] tells us that in four years [he’ll] ‘halve’ the deficit, as if [he] hasn’t borrowed another $5 trillion in the meantime. Does [he] think we’re morons?


How can anyone think these are good ideas unless their logic is "They are good ideas because they're Obama's ideas"?

Spang
05-16-2009, 03:17 PM
How can anyone think these are good ideas unless their logic is "They are good ideas because they're Obama's ideas"?

Until Obama's ideas get 4,296 Americans killed (http://icasualties.org/Iraq/index.aspx), they aren't that bad.

Laura Cereta
05-16-2009, 03:25 PM
Until Obama's ideas get 4,296 Americans killed (http://icasualties.org/Iraq/index.aspx), they aren't that bad.

That's a fallacy, a deflection, and just a poor rebuttal. NOTHING Bush did will make Obama's ideas good. That's like saying that being the victim of a gang rape is good because at least you weren't in the category of the thousands of victims of homicides each year. You did answer my question, though. Thanks. You think that Obama's ideas are good because the bar is so low that they will stay "good" until 4,296 Americans die. Well, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are now his, so I'll let you know when his ideas are no longer "good." It shouldn't take too long...

Spang
05-16-2009, 03:30 PM
NOTHING Bush did will make Obama's ideas good.

I'm not saying that all of Obama's ideas are good. All I'm saying is that until his ideas cost the lives of 4,296 Americans, they aren't that bad. Some of Obama's idea are bad but they aren't 4,296 dead Americans bad.

Laura Cereta
05-16-2009, 03:32 PM
I'm not saying that all of Obama's ideas are good. All I'm saying is that until his ideas cost the lives of 4,296 Americans, they aren't that bad. Some of Obama's idea are bad but they aren't 4,296 dead Americans bad.

...Yet.

Spang
05-16-2009, 03:37 PM
...Yet.

Yes, the effects of Obama eating $100 a pound steaks may not be realized for decades.

Laura Cereta
05-16-2009, 04:05 PM
Yes, the effects of Obama eating $100 a pound steaks may not be realized for decades.

Unlike the effects of him nationalizing the banks and auto industry, which are being felt NOW. I guess some of his other fiscally irresponsible choices not having their full impact for decades gives us something to look forward to! Yay! :rockon:

Spang
05-16-2009, 04:11 PM
Unlike the effects of him nationalizing the banks and auto industry, which are being felt NOW.

I never supported the bailouts.

Laura Cereta
05-17-2009, 01:34 PM
Bumping this because I'd still like to hear the Obama enthusiast comments on it. Is Spang the only one who will step up?

What if someone other then Obama had made all of Obama's choices? Would you still support him/her? Would it be covered by the media the same way?

Whether anyone chooses to comment or not, it's something to think about.

Laura Cereta
05-21-2009, 03:15 PM
Resurrecting and STILL looking for the Obama cheerleaders repsonse.

How would the Obama administrations' decisions be judged if they were made by someone other than Obama, like, say... Palin? :thinking:

Spang
05-21-2009, 03:25 PM
How would the Obama administrations' decisions be judged if they were made by someone other than Obama, like, say... Palin? :thinking:

What if McCain won and then died? I don't know, what difference does it make? We'll find out if Palin becomes president one day.

Laura Cereta
05-21-2009, 11:45 PM
What if McCain won and then died? I don't know, what difference does it make? We'll find out if Palin becomes president one day.

It's not about Palin; it's about people supporting Obama's decisions because they idolize him, admire him, or think he's cool-- not because the decisions are that good, or even that logical.

Jobu86
05-22-2009, 12:25 AM
It's not about Palin; it's about people supporting Obama's decisions because they idolize him, admire him, or think he's cool-- not because the decisions are that good, or even that logical.

I think Obama has made some good decisions and some poor ones. I'm not 100% thrilled with his presidency, but I'm very happy with parts of it, and think overall he's doing a good job. If he wasn't president, I'd be reacting much the same way. I didn't condemn Bush right away when he became president, and it wasn't until several years in that my major disdain for him grew.

I never thought Obama was the messiah. I thought he was the best choice for president this year (post primary) and am still glad he won. Would I be sitting on a message board saying how terrible a president Palin is if she had become president? No way, I'd give her credit for her good decisions and be disappointed in her poor ones. I just happen to believe she would make many many more poor decisions.

sojourner
05-22-2009, 12:42 AM
I think Obama has made some good decisions and some poor ones.

Care to list some of those good decisions?

Spang
05-22-2009, 12:51 AM
Care to list some of those good decisions?

Expand loan programs for small businesses, create a foreclosure prevention fund for homeowners, extend and index the 2007 Alternative Minimum Tax patch, expand eligibility for State Children's Health Insurance Fund, expand funding to train primary care providers and public health practitioners, grant Americans unrestricted rights to visit family and send money to Cuba, require new hires to sign a form affirming their hiring was not due to political affiliation or contributions, push for enactment of Matthew Shepard Act, which expands hate crime law to include sexual orientation and other factors, create a White House Office on Urban Policy, support increased funding for the NEA, appoint an assistant to the president for science and technology policy, work to overturn Ledbetter vs. Goodyear, ban lobbyist gifts to executive employees, invest in all types of alternative energy, enact tax credit for consumers for plug-in hybrid cars, support high-speed rail, provide grants to encourage energy-efficient building codes, extend unemployment insurance benefits and temporarily suspend taxes on these benefits, reverse restrictions on stem cell research and get his daughters a puppy.

To name a few.

Lealy
05-22-2009, 01:31 AM
Expand loan programs for small businesses, create a foreclosure prevention fund for homeowners(imagine this Bush did the same thing, I know I was going through one at the time, it did not work and neither will O's), extend and index the 2007 Alternative Minimum Tax patch(wait has this not been done before), expand eligibility for State Children's Health Insurance Fund(If only I could quit smoking who is going to pay for this, those same kids that SCHIP is supposed to cover), expand funding to train primary care providers and public health practitioners(I am pretty sure we are short of nurses, but doc not so much they just afford their malpractice insurance), grant Americans unrestricted rights to visit family and send money to Cuba, require new hires to sign a form affirming their hiring was not due to political affiliation or contributions(you have got to be kidding me a form), push for enactment of Matthew Shepard Act, which expands hate crime law to include sexual orientation and other factors, create a White House Office on Urban Policy(how many more Czars will we get, O is trying to set a record right), support increased funding for the NEA, appoint an assistant to the president for science and technology policy(another bureaucrat just what we were short of), work to overturn Ledbetter vs. Goodyear, ban lobbyist gifts to executive employees, invest in all types of alternative energy, enact tax credit for consumers for plug-in hybrid cars, support high-speed rail(how much is that boondoggle of Reid's going to cost), provide grants to encourage energy-efficient building codes(I have seen this before, yea on last years taxes), extend unemployment insurance benefits and temporarily suspend taxes on these benefits(would have been better if it excluded millionaires), reverse restrictions on stem cell research (which never stopped it just was not be paid for by tax payers) and get his daughters a puppy (one of maybe 3 things I like).I like the garden best.

To name a few.

I am hard to impress I guess!(:|

Spang
05-22-2009, 01:36 AM
I am hard to impress I guess!(:|

You're not alone. The majority of members of this forum are not impressed with Baracka Obama and never will be. There's not a damn thing he could do to change their minds. Thankfully, this forum is not the majority of this country.

sojourner
05-22-2009, 01:44 AM
You're not alone. The majority of members of this forum are not impressed with Baracka Obama and never will be. There's not a damn thing he could do to change their minds. Thankfully, this forum is not the majority of this country.

I would be willing to bet the members of this forum are better educated and more informed than the majority of this country. That might explain the difference.

Spang
05-22-2009, 01:59 AM
I would be willing to bet the members of this forum are better educated and more informed than the majority of this country. That might explain the difference.

I guarantee you this guy did not vote for Obama:

http://www.mathewingram.com/work/wp-content/uploads/morans.jpg

But seriously, Barack Obama and his administration are taking steps to improve education in this country.

G'aal
05-22-2009, 04:27 AM
I suppose I technically qualify as an Obama supporter, since I voted for him over McCain. I thought the article was mildly amusing - not guffaw-inducing like some seem to feel, but fairly decent satire. As for the points, they are mostly fair game against Obama. However, name a politician that cannot be second-guessed, either because of word or deed. If Hillary had won the nomination and GE, the author could have similarly had a field day, and the same with McCain. Guaranteed.

Classical Liberal
05-22-2009, 05:38 AM
Awesome find!

Laura Cereta
05-22-2009, 02:50 PM
Expand loan programs for small businesses, create a foreclosure prevention fund for homeowners(imagine this Bush did the same thing, I know I was going through one at the time, it did not work and neither will O's), extend and index the 2007 Alternative Minimum Tax patch(wait has this not been done before), expand eligibility for State Children's Health Insurance Fund(If only I could quit smoking who is going to pay for this, those same kids that SCHIP is supposed to cover), expand funding to train primary care providers and public health practitioners(I am pretty sure we are short of nurses, but doc not so much they just afford their malpractice insurance), grant Americans unrestricted rights to visit family and send money to Cuba, require new hires to sign a form affirming their hiring was not due to political affiliation or contributions(you have got to be kidding me a form), push for enactment of Matthew Shepard Act, which expands hate crime law to include sexual orientation and other factors, create a White House Office on Urban Policy(how many more Czars will we get, O is trying to set a record right), support increased funding for the NEA, appoint an assistant to the president for science and technology policy(another bureaucrat just what we were short of), work to overturn Ledbetter vs. Goodyear, ban lobbyist gifts to executive employees, invest in all types of alternative energy, enact tax credit for consumers for plug-in hybrid cars, support high-speed rail(how much is that boondoggle of Reid's going to cost), provide grants to encourage energy-efficient building codes(I have seen this before, yea on last years taxes), extend unemployment insurance benefits and temporarily suspend taxes on these benefits(would have been better if it excluded millionaires), reverse restrictions on stem cell research (which never stopped it just was not be paid for by tax payers) and get his daughters a puppy (one of maybe 3 things I like).I like the garden best.

To name a few.


I was about to systematically tear Spang's list of accomplishments up and then I realized you did it for me, Lealy. Thanks! :cool:

:e5:

Laura Cereta
05-22-2009, 03:07 PM
You're not alone. The majority of members of this forum are not impressed with Baracka Obama and never will be. There's not a damn thing he could do to change their minds. Thankfully, this forum is not the majority of this country.

God bless America! **==

YouTube - How Obama Got Elected... Interviews With Obama Voters

Jobu86
05-22-2009, 03:15 PM
Really? That video for the 10th time?

Laura Cereta
05-22-2009, 03:34 PM
Really? That video for the 10th time?

Yeah, really. It's just so funny/sad/horrifying. ;) I had a few other links I wanted to post but all of them go to videos or audio that has been erased since the election. Wonder why?

NoFear
05-22-2009, 03:55 PM
Yeah, really. It's just so funny/sad/horrifying. ;) I had a few other links I wanted to post but all of them go to videos or audio that has been erased since the election. Wonder why?


cue the video of the stupid supporters of the other side...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRqcfqiXCX0&eurl

Laura Cereta
05-22-2009, 04:03 PM
So are the two (equally disturbing) videos that were shown indicative of an ignorant minority or more a representation of the "all-knowing" majority that Spang is happy exist?


You're not alone. The majority of members of this forum are not impressed with Baracka Obama and never will be. There's not a damn thing he could do to change their minds. Thankfully, this forum is not the majority of this country.

NoFear
05-22-2009, 05:06 PM
So are the two (equally disturbing) videos that were shown indicative of an ignorant minority or more a representation of the "all-knowing" majority that Spang is happy exist?

I think Spang means that there are fools on both sides and also intelligent people as well.

Red Idiots + Red Non-Idiots voted for Mccain

Blue Idiots + Blue Non-Idiots voted for Obama

It just happens that there are more blue people then reds hence Obama won and this forum is far from fitting into the blue people mold.

Spang
05-22-2009, 07:34 PM
I think Spang means that there are fools on both sides and also intelligent people as well.

Red Idiots + Red Non-Idiots voted for Mccain

Blue Idiots + Blue Non-Idiots voted for Obama

It just happens that there are more blue people then reds hence Obama won and this forum is far from fitting into the blue people mold.

You get a gold star. Idiots come in all shapes, sizes and political ideologies.