(April 10th, 2008) "Obama & Larry Sinclair: "Story goes public in Puerto Rico"

[Wyoming Dem]

I apologize for the negative OB stuff but more prevalent than "GREAT HILLARY" stuff. This is very germaine as it has been a hot topic on this forum for a couple of weeks.

Yesterday in Puerto Rico, a bombshell fell on Barack Obama’s hopes to at
least win a small percentage of primary votes in said jurisdiction (he
was only receiving 20% of support in the polls). This “bomb” goes by the
name of Larry Sinclair and his allegations of homosexuality and cocaine
use against Barack ******* Obama, which happened to go ‘prime time’
yesterday throughout the Island.
http://savagepolitics.com/?p=274

[Wyoming Dem]

I had a bad title on this so changed it. Very appropo with all the Larry Sinclair stuff we have had lately.

[Smart cookie]

Love this paragraph-

The question about all of this remains: Will this have a trickle down effect into the United States? Unlike American journalists, the Puertorican press WILL ask Obama about this controversy if he ever decides to show himself on the Island, whenever it’s primaries become inevitable. Will the Mainstream Media pick up the fact that the whole Sinclair story is now MAINSTREAM in Puerto Rico, or will they decide to ignore it? It is clear that even if reporters in the United States decide to air a criticism of Puerto Rico’s “negligence” or “audacity” in publishing this story, Sinclair will automatically become the main theme and will thus inevitably spread throughout the Country.

[joeysky18]

This one of the best article written on this topic.

[Santiago]

You tube link to interview. Big story in PR.

Part 1

YouTube - Obama Gay Ques 1

Part 2

YouTube - Obama Gay Ques 2

TV station link with original video.

http://www.wapa.tv/superxclusivo/

[Peppermint Patty]

Interesting:

The question about all of this remains: Will this have a trickle down effect into the United States? Unlike American journalists, the Puerto Rican press WILL ask Obama about this controversy if he ever decides to show himself on the Island, whenever it’s primaries become inevitable. Will the Mainstream Media pick up the fact that the whole Sinclair story is now MAINSTREAM in Puerto Rico, or will they decide to ignore it? It is clear that even if reporters in the United States decide to air a criticism of Puerto Rico’s “negligence” or “audacity” in publishing this story, Sinclair will automatically become the main theme and will thus inevitably spread throughout the Country.

Too bad it's only the SinclairGate scandal that PR runs with. It would be nice if they'd be just as concerned, if not more so, with all the lies and questionable judgments that Obama has shown is par for the course. Not to mention his "friends" like Ayers, Rezko, etc., his terrible voting records both as a state and US Senator.

It would be wishful thinking to hope that people would turn to Hillary Clinton because she is better qualified, intelligent, gets along with the Republicans and has solid plans for health care and the war in Iraq as well as the economy.

But hey, give the people a good old-fashioned sex and drugs scandal and the media will run with it. Eventually. :rolleyes:

[Wyoming Dem]

Really??? There is something besides sex & drugs???

[Smart cookie]

I just sent it to Hannity. Wanna join me?
http://www.hannity.com/contactus.asp I said that even if you doubt the actual story the fact that it is news all over Puerto Rico makes it news in itself. It is a way to report the story without actually commenting on the story.;)

[Santiago]

Just sent the link to the video and TV station to Hannity. Stated my family in San Juan says it is the talk of the town. Big news.

[mkreyns]

I have been waiting for all Obama's ****to hit the fan! I have emailed this to Sean Hannity and "Hardball"

We are going to see a lot more of this in the coming attractions!
Check out the New Lawsuit about Obama's Religion Thread

[thebword]

Thank you for the video! I wonder how much longer our news can get away with ignore this one? Trying to force Sen. Clinton out before the s*** hits the fan.

[Wyoming Dem]

Thanks for finding the video!

[Santiago]

You're welcome!

[mkreyns]

The video needs to be sent to Hannity! I sent the article link, but I don't know how to send the video. It also needs to be saved by someone who knows how to do that.

PS: I heard that the polls in PR went up 13% for Clinton. Where was that? I'm doing so much searching I can't remember where anything is anymore. I think it might be in the comments section of the article.

[RayinAR]

Wow.

[Santiago]

I am compiling the video as we speak.

To use the MSN rational, it is news because it is big news in Puerto Rico, one of the last democratic primaries. I am not making a judgment as to its credibiliy one way or the other.

[skc1976]

Hmmm, with this story breaking down there, it could give a HUGE surge to Clinton.

You know, something is interesting. Sinclair has these homosexual allegations to Obama. Obama does his best to avoid the gay community. Makes you wonder if there's some validity to it because gays have great gaydar.

[swannyj]

It has huge potential to blow up in our face. I know everyone is excited that this is coming to the forefront but as the article says MSM will have to address it in one way or another.

Yes, we can all root for it to become headline news but in my opinion we can better support the campaign by forcing a look at the issues and even Rezko, Ayers, etc. Until this "scandal" is vetted we should keep our distance!

Just my 2 cents, and yes, I know I am the minority (if not the lone ranger) in this.

[PuppyDogMom]

Really??? There is something besides sex & drugs???

Yeah, I was confused by that, too.

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

[joeysky18]

It has huge potential to blow up in our face. I know everyone is excited that this is coming to the forefront but as the article says MSM will have to address it in one way or another.

Yes, we can all root for it to become headline news but in my opinion we can better support the campaign by forcing a look at the issues and even Rezko, Ayers, etc. Until this "scandal" is vetted we should keep our distance!

Just my 2 cents, and yes, I know I am the minority (if not the lone ranger) in this.

This is the same topic as Wright. Hillary should not touch it, it's toxic. But we need to keep pushing Wright story in MSM. They only cover it because people wanted to know.

Hillary should not touch Larry Sinclair topic. But her supporters need to push the story. Otherwise, the MSM will let it die. It will never come up.

[Wyoming Dem]

I agree. I think we can let others push this.

[swannyj]

With Wright there was not question about the validity. Sinclair is still a VERY BIG question mark.

[maximuss]

HRC should completely avoid this as it has potential to be toxic. We should focus on the issues , stay on message , be positive , focus on the ground work and getting PA voters out . This should be our ONLY focus. The media cannot bury this story indefinitely. it will come out someday until then we need to focus on our game

[RayinAR]

With Wright there was not question about the validity. Sinclair is still a VERY BIG question mark.

I totally agree with this. But I find it curious that Obama knows this story is out there circulating and he has not once addressed it. I am wondering if maybe there is a little fire where the smoke is coming from. I still reserve judgement for more evidence one way or the other.

[Santiago]

I understand the call for a totally positive approach to working for Hillary's election. I agree with that call, in principle. I am still a child of the 60's at heart.

Peace. Love. Brother/Sisterhood.

However, as quoted from the Godfather II, Hyman Roth says to Michael Corleone, "This is the business we've chosen." I have been involved in the political process since I could vote. No quarter asked, no quarter given. Thats politics.

Obama has run a Sub Rosa campaign of race baiting. I know how it works. I have been a Latino activist for many years. Saying "rolling the dice." is racist? Come on! That is his and his surrogates strategy.

Please be clear that I do not advocate Ad Hominem attacks, but reasoned, well researched advocacy for Hillary's candidacy and against Obama's truthfulness, positions and experience are fair game. Again, that is politics.

[mkreyns]

This is the same topic as Wright. Hillary should not touch it, it's toxic. But we need to keep pushing Wright story in MSM. They only cover it because people wanted to know.

Hillary should not touch Larry Sinclair topic. But her supporters need to push the story. Otherwise, the MSM will let it die. It will never come up.

I agree that Hillary can't touch it, but the media needs to get all of this out and let the people know who they are voting for. I believe that Hillary may know more than what she could ever let on, but she can't say anything. We can read it on the forum and the Internet, but so many do not even have an inkling about anything because they rely on the news TV media. Some are older and do not know how to use a computer or the Internet.

My mother is one who just learned email and she was shocked about the things that I knew from researching Obama. She couldn't understand that TV media had not covered any important topics like they used to. She knew nothing. I mean nothing about Obama/

[hillary4change]

He has so many marks out there against him..we know about them, but we have done our own vetting, since the media will not.
The American people will hopefully find out, before we are stuck with him!! If they knew everything that was being covered up..he would drop like a lead balloon in the polls!!!

[swannyj]

Dianne just posted this;
ON GOOGLE NEWS!! 1 HOUR AGO

Does Hillary Clinton have a bombshell to unleash on Barack Obama next week?
Will Pennsylvania voters soon have more "bombshell" information to ponder when making their presidential vote in two weeks?

From the conservative National Review, " A smart political operative said within earshot of me yesterday that if Hillary (Clinton) has more metaphorical bombshells to drop on Obama — and this operative has heard secondhand that she does — she'll do so between April 16, the date of her next debate with (Barack) Obama, and April 22, Pennsylvania's primary day. The timing, of course, is so she doesn't get asked about it by the moderator or confronted by Obama."

Is this pure off-base speculation or informed speculation? Some Democrats supporting Obama have fretted that there might be footage of Obama or wife Michelle nodding during a damaging Jeremiah Wright tirade. Could this be it or would it be something else? Or is there nothing there to unveil? And if there were something wouldn't they have done it already? And if they do, will it completely back fire on them in a big way because it will be seen as dirty politics?

[floorrunner]

It has huge potential to blow up in our face. I know everyone is excited that this is coming to the forefront but as the article says MSM will have to address it in one way or another.

Yes, we can all root for it to become headline news but in my opinion we can better support the campaign by forcing a look at the issues and even Rezko, Ayers, etc. Until this "scandal" is vetted we should keep our distance!

Just my 2 cents, and yes, I know I am the minority (if not the lone ranger) in this.

I agree with you that we need to keep our distance on this issue for a while. If it all turns out to be true, the real issue with it is all the lies that would be connected with it, not whether or not he might be gay.

[Linda C]

You know to be honest I am a bit taken aback by this.
Obviously you forgot the new "rumors" before the SC primary regarding Hillary and her personal assistant of Arab heritage?

Just Google it to find what is out there and be prepared for it.

[samkm]

This is no comparison on story.. I am glad they pulled it out of the closet and opened it for closer examination.

Beware that it is still in allegation. Read the entire article.

At the same time, we should be able to refer to this article in our blogs. The article does a good job of summarizing the issue and its current status. It aptly calls attention to what we should consider, given where the chips lay AT PRESENT. So, a very good article.

[Disfranchised]

I just sent it to Hannity. Wanna join me?
http://www.hannity.com/contactus.asp I said that even if you doubt the actual story the fact that it is news all over Puerto Rico makes it news in itself. It is a way to report the story without actually commenting on the story.;)

Sent!

[Lodi]

Really??? There is something besides sex & drugs???

Hee-hee-hee! ;)

[Lodi]

With Wright there was not question about the validity. Sinclair is still a VERY BIG question mark.

People in/from NJ who love former gov. Jim McGreevey (me, me, me!) did not want to believe rumors of his nighttime trysts on the Garden State Parkway, either, but they were true.

Given the way Oblahma runs with homophobes and retains his relationship with his "spiritual" mentor (who maybe preaches the "evils" of the gay lifestyle, may he choke on the words), I wouldn't be a bit surprised if this is true. The Obamination has not a jot of authentity about him, beginning, I think, with his very identity. We shall see (dear Lord, a little divine intervention, sil vous plait?).

Now I'm off to happily read the article!! :D

[Lodi]

Just sent the link to the video and TV station to Hannity. Stated my family in San Juan says it is the talk of the town. Big news.

Viva Puerto Rico! Viva full disclosure! Viva Santiago!

[mkreyns]

I think the public has a right to know and let them judge for themselves. If it is not reported, then we have communism in progress. When and if they report it they can say that this is "just in." even though they do not know the validity of the claims or allegations. They do have an obligation to allow the American people to know about it and judge for themselves.

People have a right to know whether they believe it or not.

[Bets1]

WTG Puerto Rico!!

[Santiago]

Original videos from TV website are now imbedded.

[Bacio83]

video saved on desktop ;)

[Santiago]

Videos Posted on youtube.

[Santiago]

There are two parts.

[Santiago]

You are right, Hillary herself does always have to keep herself above the fray.

[RachachaSharon]

If I was Hillary, I wouldn't touch this with a 10-foot pole. I wouldn't mention it at all. Whether or not this actually happened, it stinks to high heavens and could have far-reaching repercussions.

[TeejDee]

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/

An attorney for the Obama campaign has now responded on the same tv show that interviewed Larry Sinclair. They are saying it is Hillary's doing.....That means this has to come out very soon in the MSM.

[CGP]

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/

An attorney for the Obama campaign has now responded on the same tv show that interviewed Larry Sinclair. They are saying it is Hillary's doing.....That means this has to come out very soon in the MSM.

What a disgrace. The Obama campaign is disgraceful. About time Obama started accepting responsibility for his own problems & disasters, instead of narcissistically pointing the finger at everyone else but himself.

[RachachaSharon]

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/

An attorney for the Obama campaign has now responded on the same tv show that interviewed Larry Sinclair. They are saying it is Hillary's doing.....That means this has to come out very soon in the MSM.

It's pretty clear that it's Larry Sinclair's doing. The Obama camp probably didn't think this filth would become public and, if it did, Sinclair would be labeled a lunatic. Now they'll try to smear more dirt but on Hillary. These people have to be stopped.

[trading wine for beer]

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/

An attorney for the Obama campaign has now responded on the same tv show that interviewed Larry Sinclair. They are saying it is Hillary's doing.....That means this has to come out very soon in the MSM.

figures they'd try to twist this against Hillary. :rolleyes:

Anything to deflect it from the BO campaign and stick it to Hillary.

[Annie]

Surely after a while even the biased media will realize what BO is doing by accusing Hillary all the time. How can she possibly accuse BO of this - Ridiculous. Larry Sinclair said nobody not McCain or Clinton or Edwards or Richardson (interesting he mentioned Richardson) are involved or talked to him about any of this. But Obama's people paid for the lie detector test.... lol!

I thought he sounded sane and reasonable and answered the questions in a truthful manner. I also think if this is fact regarding the use of crack cocain as recently as last year it is a very serious matter - the sexual thing is not our business. The cocain is! How on earth can a President be doing a line of cocaine when the 3 am call comes in. Not a good thing and coupled with all the other obvious lies - what lies have we not found out. Blogging this is one way and sending to Hannity another. The Republicans have a lot to bring out - every day. What on earth made BO think he could do what he is doing and win.... well he seems to be doing it. I don't get it. Is he the mass hypnotist - is that his koolaid?

[mkreyns]

They have no way of tracing this back to Hillary, that is absurd. What are they going to do just lamely blame it on her-Yes, but they have no proof. The way to handle it is denial.

I just want to see when this will surface in the news. It has to, like everything else that is hiding. It was no small feat to get the discovery heard by a Washington DC judge, Judge Kennedy.

[mooaks]

Hillary Clinton is a smart lawyer herself. She knows how to handle these false accusations against her. You don't think she has time to be watching this stuff on You Tube. She probably would be more than willing to accept a win over this, but she isn't about to direct an attempt to win the candidacy over this stuff. If something like this backfires, it could ruin her. She's smarter than that.;););)

[Jayling]

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/

An attorney for the Obama campaign has now responded on the same tv show that interviewed Larry Sinclair. They are saying it is Hillary's doing.....That means this has to come out very soon in the MSM.
oh for goodness sake -- if Barry had a booger hanging out of his snooty, snotty nose, he'd blame it on Hillary.

geez oh man...

[Bets1]

WOW ~ this is really developing! I just spent 1 hour reading his blog from today.

Finally, Larry has what he's wanted: a response from Obama's attorney, Andrés W. López is a statehood supporter and a member of Mr. Obama's campaign committee in Puerto Rico. Mr. Lopez's phone interview with the TV station that interviewed Larry:

YouTube - Obama Attorney on SuperXclusivo Pt 2

One of Larry's supporters is sending the media the following:

FOR YOUR [Larry's] APPROVAL: OBAMA FINALLY ACKNOWLEDGES LARRY SINCLAIR’S ACCUSATIONS OF THEIR DRUG USE AND SEXUAL INTIMACY IN 1999. OBAMA, SPEAKING THROUGH A PUERTO RICAN ATTORNEY FOR HIS CAMPAIGN THERE, MR. ANDRES W. LOPEZ, SAYS LARRY’S ACCUSATIONS OF THEIR TWO MEETINGS IN 1999 FOR COCAINE AND SEX ARE "FALSEHOODS". THE ATTORNEY FOR OBAMA APPEARED, VIA TELEPHONE, APRIL 10, 2008, ON THE SAME PUERTO RICAN T.V. SHOW "SUPERXCLUSIVE" ON WAPA TV THAT BROKE THIS STORY EARLY THIS WEEK. THE ATTORNEY MADE CHARGES AGAINST LARRY SINCLAIR CLAIMING THAT LARRY IS "COMPLETELY ILL" AND HAS "NO CREDIBILITY" AND IS A "DISGRACE OF A PERSON". MR. LOPEZ ALSO CLAIMED THAT LARRY WAS DOING THIS BECAUSE OBAMA IS "ON TOP" OF SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON IN THE U.S. PRESIDENTAL RACE. LARRY SINCLAIR HAS BEEN EMPHATIC FROM THE BEGINNING THAT HE IS NOT, NOR HAS HE EVER BEEN, AFFILIATED WITH SENATOR CLINTON’S OR SENATOR MCCAIN’S POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS AND THAT THESE CHARGES BY OBAMA ARE TOTALLY FALSE. STAY TUNED!


OK Maybe refer them to the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aY0_6sAyIfY

One supporter wrote:

I should think the Obama campaign monitors this blog closely and that HC and McC also aeave tabs on it - so lets talk to them.

I would think this matter has moved to the top of the agenda of all the political campaigns. It may only be a question of tactics now - how best to use it.

The conventional wisdom will tell HC and JMcC not to touch it.

But if Obama were to come out and accuse them of involvement then they could stir up a fuss with their denial. But he will never do that. If he speaks on the subject he will say he does not believe Larry is anything other than a loner with some misguided supporters on the net. But he will instruct his surrogates to continue to suggest that Larry is being used by HC.

My own view is that HC should find a way of seizing the initiative. I’m not sure that Lopez’s attempts to implicate her campaign is strong enough for her to make a personal protest. But she could instruct a surrogate in Puerto Rico to object to any such implication and make clear that her campaign is not involved with Larry. But if I were them I would not disassociate from Larry. It would be enough to say that they have no reason to believe he is anything other than what he says - an indvidual American who wants to make a statement about what he claims were his past encounters with Obama.

A interesting fact for Hannity's Sun night program on Obama/Ayers:

Senator Obama belligerently pushed for the Clinton tax returns,a nd the 1000’s of pages of her calendar. Yet at the same time, his calendars are nowhere to be found. Let’s be realistic– he is the political arena; he is running for political positions; staffers would be keeping accurate stas for future questioning. But, of course, his staffers are the one’s who say that he knew the Ayre’s because their children were in the same school when Obama went to Ayre’s home in 1995….. problem is….. he had no children at that time!

This is not going to be a good weekend for Obama:

Andy Martin just sent me a piece on what his press conference will be on Saturday…here is a portion of his commentary:

"I demand that Barry and Michele end their 'Secret Campaign', and stop holding clandestine meetings with wealthy contributors, where this pair stomps on Americans and ridicules our values. We now know from the San Francisco Tape that Obama uses these secret meetings with elite contributors to give liberal extremists the ‘Real Obama,’ and to deliver his real message of 'hate and contempt for Amerika.' ...

[Johnf]

This is the same topic as Wright. Hillary should not touch it, it's toxic. But we need to keep pushing Wright story in MSM. They only cover it because people wanted to know.

Hillary should not touch Larry Sinclair topic. But her supporters need to push the story. Otherwise, the MSM will let it die. It will never come up.

I couldn't agree more. Great post. You are very right here. We can't and should not ignore this.

[PuppyDogMom]

Isn't it interesting that when Hillary says something that's smart, articulate, thoughtful, and accurate that Obama agrees with her, and when Obama does something stupid, he blames her.

The man can't breathe without her. He needs to get a life of his own.:rolleyes:

[samkm]

Honestly, the rate at which he is coming out with boneheadedness, I would not at all be surprised if there was real fire below this topic. Perhaps media lightbulb will light one of these days and they start to scratch below the surface of this story.

[Annie]

WOW ~ this is really developing! I just spent 1 hour reading his blog from today.

Finally, Larry has what he's wanted: a response from Obama's attorney, Andrés W. López is a statehood supporter and a member of Mr. Obama's campaign committee in Puerto Rico. Mr. Lopez's phone interview with the TV station that interviewed Larry:

YouTube - Obama Attorney on SuperXclusivo Pt 2 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aY0_6sAyIfY)

One of Larry's supporters is sending the media the following:
One supporter wrote:


Quote:
I should think the Obama campaign monitors this blog closely and that HC and McC also aeave tabs on it - so lets talk to them.

I would think this matter has moved to the top of the agenda of all the political campaigns. It may only be a question of tactics now - how best to use it.

The conventional wisdom will tell HC and JMcC not to touch it.

But if Obama were to come out and accuse them of involvement then they could stir up a fuss with their denial. But he will never do that. If he speaks on the subject he will say he does not believe Larry is anything other than a loner with some misguided supporters on the net. But he will instruct his surrogates to continue to suggest that Larry is being used by HC.

My own view is that HC should find a way of seizing the initiative. I’m not sure that Lopez’s attempts to implicate her campaign is strong enough for her to make a personal protest. But she could instruct a surrogate in Puerto Rico to object to any such implication and make clear that her campaign is not involved with Larry. But if I were them I would not disassociate from Larry. It would be enough to say that they have no reason to believe he is anything other than what he says - an indvidual American who wants to make a statement about what he claims were his past encounters with Obama.

A interesting fact for Hannity's Sun night program on Obama/Ayers:
Quote:
Senator Obama belligerently pushed for the Clinton tax returns,a nd the 1000’s of pages of her calendar. Yet at the same time, his calendars are nowhere to be found. Let’s be realistic– he is the political arena; he is running for political positions; staffers would be keeping accurate stas for future questioning. But, of course, his staffers are the one’s who say that he knew the Ayre’s because their children were in the same school when Obama went to Ayre’s home in 1995….. problem is….. he had no children at that time!
This is not going to be a good weekend for Obama:
Quote:
Andy Martin just sent me a piece on what his press conference will be on Saturday…here is a portion of his commentary:

"I demand that Barry and Michele end their 'Secret Campaign', and stop holding clandestine meetings with wealthy contributors, where this pair stomps on Americans and ridicules our values. We now know from the San Francisco Tape that Obama uses these secret meetings with elite contributors to give liberal extremists the ‘Real Obama,’ and to deliver his real message of 'hate and contempt for Amerika.' ...

This is not going to be a good weekend for Obama:

Link for Millionaire's row campaign fund raising for Obama - no grass roots donars here.

http://www.zombietime.com/obama_visits_billionaires_row/

[ALL4HILLARY]

Murray I cannot see if this video is posted somewhere, and I cannot find the thread about Singlair. You could merge if it is better

YouTube - Obama Is GAY?

[hills]

You know what is crazy, an Obama lawyer said that all this was being done by Hillary's campaign. Hillary's camaign hasn't mentioned anything about larry and they are already blaming her.

[RayinAR]

You know what is crazy, an Obama lawyer said that all this was being done by Hillary's campaign. Hillary's camaign hasn't mentioned anything about larry and they are already blaming her.

Well don't you know the Great Flood was Hillary's fault. Everything bad can some way or another (extreme sarcasm) be tracked back to Hillary.

[ALL4HILLARY]

You know what is crazy, an Obama lawyer said that all this was being done by Hillary's campaign. Hillary's camaign hasn't mentioned anything about larry and they are already blaming her.

Of course, the same way they play the race card by blaming Bill Clinton , back at the SC primary. It really help them but you know what: All this S**T they are throwing to HILLARY and everybody else to cover their campaign, and make voters believe that Obama is the second coming, it will come back in their faces.

[Eddie3dfx]

I sent the story to hannity, hopefully they report it.
Turns out the polygraph test was true, which was determined by the computer results.
The guy who reported it false, reported 2 questions false, but yet didn't report the other 200 questions..
Then said the results were verified by another polygraph expert and gave a date, yet the other polygraph expert didn't recieve the first results until after the verified date...
Obama has his team trying to cover up this story everywhere.

[Eddie3dfx]

YouTube - LARRY SINCLAIR ON E&J SHOW


Newsoundbit on the EJ show with sinclair :D

[Liz007]

did anyone send these to the DNC or RNC even? Pelosi, Brazile, Reid, Dean?

[CQ4Hillary]

Really??? There is something besides sex & drugs???

Umm, Rock & Roll?;)

CQ

[Karee Wyoming]

I apologize for the negative OB stuff but more prevalent than "GREAT HILLARY" stuff. This is very germaine as it has been a hot topic on this forum for a couple of weeks.


http://savagepolitics.com/?p=274 I am sure he will never show his face in Puerto Rico as they surely would ask him about it!!! That is why he sent his mean wife. He doesent give a damm about the votes in Puerto Rico because they cant give him any votes in the GE. I predict they will shut it down before it ever gets to P.R. Thier plan is to go thr Oregon & Kentucky hoping he will make a big splash - If the meeting on May 31 goes badly for Hillary - unless thier is such a uproar from her supporters, that will be the end of it!!! The SD are just sitting like vultures waiting for the kill!!!

It is so pathetically obvious!!! I hate myself for being so negative and not holding out more hope for our girl, I cant beleive she has fought so hard for so long when the deck has been staacked against her from the begining.
I have long supiscioned that it was T. Kennedy & John Kerry that conviced BO to run against Hillary, and sure as hell when Ted had his episode it was all over the news that he was the one that BO went to for advise as to get in the game. Lets not forget H. Dean who made sure she could never win due to the one sided caucass's , Disinfranchising Fla & Mich, proportioned delegates. etc. etc. He has been the ringleader from the beginning!!!!!
Excuse my spelling but in a hurry and when i get so angry it is terrible, guess I should use spell check!!!!